Mother Criminally Prosecuted For Failing To Celebrate Son Being Robbed By Out Of Control Hooliganhttps://t.co/j0hyv4o5yJ
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 30, 2025
Saturday, August 30, 2025
Mother Criminally Prosecuted For Failing To Celebrate Son Being Robbed By Out Of Control Hooligan
Disturbing Number Of Plague Cultists Lay Down Their Lives To Their Alchemical Diety
Disturbing Number Of Plague Cultists Lay Down Their Lives To Their Alchemical Diety https://t.co/f06BU7Q5se
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 28, 2025
Friday, August 29, 2025
Christian Transhumanism Neither Christian Nor Human
Christian Transhumanism Neither Christian Nor Human
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) August 28, 2025 at 7:41 PM
[image or embed]
Urantia Offshoot Cultist Dead
Urantia Offshoot Cultist Dead
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) August 28, 2025 at 7:36 PM
[image or embed]
Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Transgender Terrorist Slaughters Parochial School Students
Transgender Terrorist Slaughters Parochial School Studentshttps://t.co/v2eTikEoPL
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 27, 2025
Monday, August 25, 2025
Sunday, August 24, 2025
Antique Ford
Photo by FBM pic.twitter.com/hMxccLZzhJ
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 22, 2025
Photo by FBM pic.twitter.com/VOMEXNXjvr
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 22, 2025
Landrover Defender
Photo by FBM pic.twitter.com/NEh26DGh03
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 22, 2025
Photo by FBM pic.twitter.com/051SbYQF5d
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 22, 2025
Will fauci weaponize horrendous facial tumors to afflict the human species?
Will fauci weaponize horrendous facial tumors to afflict the human species?https://t.co/oeQFAs6g3f
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 22, 2025
Will Monolith To Obama Displace Ghetto Neighborhood?
Will Monolith To Obama Displace Ghetto Neighborhood?https://t.co/IGsyu3ZsQM
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 21, 2025
IT Whiz Indians Proving To Be Incompetent Behind The Wheel
IT Whiz Indians Proving To Be Incompetent Behind The Wheelhttps://t.co/YJNUeaoe7B
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 21, 2025
Exercise In Fresh Air Proven Hazardous To Health
Exercise In Fresh Air Proven Hazardous To Healthhttps://t.co/XvCv8NUW4k
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 21, 2025
Mouthy Shrew Outraged Ugly Men Dare Look At Women
Though uncouth behavior, shouldn’t there be as much outrage over police enforcing a behavior that is not explicitly part of the criminal or legal code?
Too bad the United Kingdom is not as enthusiastic against interdicting actual Islamic migrant sex offenders rather than native boorish lauts.
Why Aren’t Young People Dating?
Don’t know about now, but because back then was never good enough for anyone and in a religious environment is beaten into your head if you cavorted with someone of even a differing interpretation of Christianity, you’d never be allowed to do anything within your circle of churches other than surrender your income of course.
So the young are to be verbally berated if they date and apparently berated when they no longer day.
The scam aspects of organized religion for you.
Why The Manosphere Appeals to Young Men (It's Not Misogyny)
How dare a man think he exists for a reason other than to surrender his resources to women.
Apparently it is not enough for a man to keep his hands to himself.
No longer should he permitted to think as he wants either.
Andrew Tate Is Wrong About Marriage
Married Christians might very well be the happiest people.
That does you no good if you are the type no worthwhile person wants.
Why are you obligated to settle for someone that you don’t want not even for the the person you’d be married to but rather to placate authority figures that don’t even care that you exist?
All that can be hoped for is not to be scammed out of what you have accumulated.
Are married people really happier or are they afraid to say otherwise out of fear of setting the spouse into a rage?
Saturday, August 23, 2025
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Monday, August 18, 2025
Single Mother Demands Man Without Kids
It does not logically follow that because a single mother might do more for the kids than does a single father, that she deserves a man without kids.
Sunday, August 17, 2025
Friday, August 15, 2025
Thursday, August 14, 2025
Friday, August 08, 2025
Gabbard Reluctant To Discuss Possibility Of Extraterrestrial Visitation
Gabbard Reluctant To Discuss Possibility Of Extraterrestrial Visitation
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) August 8, 2025 at 2:12 PM
[image or embed]
Wednesday, August 06, 2025
Tuesday, August 05, 2025
An Analysis Of “Blinded By Might: Can The Religious Right Save America”, Part 2
The term “fundamentalism” was derived from a series of booklets titled “The Fundamentals: A Testimony Of Truth” that defined and defended a number of what were agreed to be the essential Christian doctrines such as the infallible inspiration of Scripture, the deity of Christ, the Virgin Birth, the substitutionary atonement, the resurrection of Christ, and the Second Coming. These teachings came to be expounded in such an explicit manner to stand in contrast to what became known as Modernism. Modernism, also referred to as Theological Liberalism, held that Christianity needed to be understood in light of contemporary scholarship even if that meant certain traditional doctrines had to be reformulated to comply with these alleged discrepancies. Foremost among these no doubt ranked evolutionary biology, textual criticism calling into question the historicity or accuracy of the Biblical accounts, and doubts regarding the miraculous events detailed in these pages noted for contradicting scientific normality.
The movement began with considerable enthusiasm. The first World Christian Fundamentals Association meeting was held in May 1919 as an outgrowth of the Philadelphia Prophecy Conference, The focus was expanded beyond eschatological speculation and study in order to form an interdenominational association consisting of a variety of theological conservatives with the purposes of confronting “false teachers, damnable heresies, and the Great Apostasy (Fitzgerald, 115).” However, this effort to win back the faith and hopefully the nation along with it lost much of its steam when it hit something of a cultural brick wall in the form of the so-called Scopes Monkey Trial. The parameters of this pivotal battle in the ongoing war for the soul of America transpired in response to numerous meetings convened by the World Christian Fundamentals Association primarily across the South in opposition to the theory of evolution.
Inspired by a crusade against evolution spearheaded by famed Populist Williams Jennings Bryan along with the founder of the World Christian Fundamentals Association William B. Riley, in March 1925 the Tennessee legislature enacted a law making it a crime to teach evolution in terms of denying the Genesis creation account. Both sides were itching for a fight. Instead of rushing to the defense of an educator whose liberty had already been violated independently of an orchestrated campaign, the American Civil Liberties Union even had to advertise for a litigation guinea pig to challenge the law. Two Dayton Tennessee businessmen actually had to cajole teacher John Scopes to step forward as the test case. From the way the account is presented in “The Evangelicals: The Struggle To Shape America”, had the ACLU had its way the law would have been rendered unconstitutional as a result of a demure legal proceeding. However, to its credit, the World Christian Fundamentals Association realized that so much was at stake that Byran lobbied to get himself appointed as counsel to the prosecution.
The trial itself became a media event. With the legendary William Jennings Bryan a part of the prosecution, a trial lawyer as profoundly renowned in his own right Clarence Darrow stepped forward on behalf of the defense. The nation was enthralled by the festering spectacle.
Frances Fitzgerald writes, “For two weeks in July that year Dayton, a hill town of 1700 people ... became the news capital of the nation (135).” A Chicago radio station broadcast live from the town across the country. A swarm of journalists descended to cover the proceedings along with a litany of entrepreneurial sorts --- both secular and sacred --- to hawk their wears and to promote their particular understanding of the Gospel message.
Bryan could not be faulted for the sincerity of his enthusiasm. However, it could be argued that perhaps his pride got the better of him and the task before him one for which he was not sufficiently prepared. Unable to get the testimony of the defense's expert witness holding to the compatibility of Darwinism and Christianity admitted as evidence, Darrow in an unorthodox move called on Bryan of the prosecution as an expert on the Bible. The firebrand could not turn down such an apologetic challenge despite advice to the contrary.
Like the Serpent in the Garden of Eden detailed in Genesis 3, Darrow found a dangling string that when tugged could unravel the conceptual web holding much of Bryan's case together and in a sense ultimately the perceived rationality of the worldview he professed with such vehemence. Without a doubt, the faith held by Bryan was indeed sincere. Yet like so many of us, he was out of his element in defending it when under hostile assault. The line of questioning pursued by Darrow began by examining the miraculous elements at the heart of a number of the Biblical accounts and the attendant contradictions supposedly befuddling the most erudite of scholars.
For example, Darrow made a fuss how in regards to the account of Jonah that the sea creature that swallowed the disobedient prophet in the Old Testament was referred to as a large fish but as a whale in the New Testament. It is pointed out that Byran did not know this. Apparently it was not within his wherewithal to ask for a time frame of at what point in history it was discovered in terms of the English language that a whale was not the same thing as a large fish from the perspective of technical biology.
Like a wily serpent, Darrow knew now was the time to strike. In perhaps the most devastating move, Darrow manipulated Byran into acquiescing that that the six days detailed in the Book of Genesis did not necessarily constitute literal twenty-four hour periods but rather could have been epochs of indeterminate lengths of time. As such, the door had been opened to the possibility that evolution was the means by which God directed organisms from one level of advancement to the next.
Technically, the prosecution won the case. A sense of foreboding defeat, however, hung in the air in regards to Fundamentalism as a robust cultural influence and dynamic social force. The judge put a halt to the increasingly acrimonious exchange between Darrow and Bryan. Bryan's hectoring was stricken from the record. Reporters covering the trial spun the account as a victory of rational science over ignorant Biblical literalism. Though Bryan seemed as if he was rallying to continue the fight through other means such as the publication of his own unread closing remarks, he died in his sleep a mere five days after the trial prompting speculation that he was no doubt heartbroken over what had transpired.
Of this culture war defeat, Ed Dobson writes, “In the aftermath of the trial, fundamentalists withdrew from the public square and focused on building their own subculture of churches, denominations, schools, organizations, ... and associations (35).” Fundamentalists, probably even more so than with other of Christianity's interpretative branches, held rigorously to the notion of ecclesiastical and cultural separation derived in part from Scriptural admonitions to “come out of and be ye separate” and “touch not the unclean thing” found in II Corinthians 6:17. By adhering to such principles, it was believed that the church as a body and the individual as a believer could maintain doctrinal integrity awaiting the consummation of all things at the end of the age as the world waxed worse and worse while presenting the saving truth of the Gospel to the few of the remnant willing to embrace Christ as Lord and Savior.
For decades, from that point Evangelical conservatives for the most part pursued a defensive sociopolitical strategy. Such a sense of detachment was easy to maintain when the culture remained adorned in a broadly Christian veneer despite increasingly prominent assaults against the foundations. However, by the late 1970's and early 1980's, a number of developments had taken place some might insist were exacerbated in part due to such Christian disengagement such as the legalization of abortion, the removal of prayer from public schools, and a generalized disregard for traditional morality as epitomized by increasing rates of divorce, the broadening acceptance of homosexuality, and the expansion of salacious entertainment.
Dobson writes that Moral Majority was founded by Jerry Falwell as a nonpartisan organization to promote morality in public life. The name was derived from the term “silent majority” referenced by President Richard Nixon to categorize Americans who in no way supported the radical political movements of the 1960's and 1970's such as demonstrations against the Vietnam War that often degenerated into outbreaks of anti-American violence but who were often afraid to articulate their own policy preferences out of a fear of reprisals or an aversion to contentious confrontation (38). After assuring that the purpose of Moral Majority was not to take over America, Dobson proceeds to elaborate what exactly it was the organization did and did not advocate.
The Moral Majority platform consisted of the following. Firstly, despite positing an ethical system steeped in Judeo-Christian presuppositions, the Moral Majority held to the Separation of Church and State in terms that the organization did not require adherence to a singular theological perspective in the form of an established national church. Secondly, the Moral Majority was pro-life. The organization opposed pornography and drug abuse. Moral Majority believed that a strong national defense was the best way to deter war and ensure liberty. Relatedly, the Moral Majority for religious as well as human rights reasons articulated an indefatigable support for the nation of Israel. And while supporting equal rights for women, the Moral Majority did not believe that the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution was the most prudent means of doing so.
Along with such a statement regarding what the organization believed, the founders of Moral Majority such as Ed Dobson for purposes of clarification also provided a statement of what Moral Majority was not (39). Foremostly, Moral Majority was not a political party. As such, Moral Majority did not officially endorse candidates. While motivated by Christian principles, the leaders of Moral Majority were not out to explicitly elect born again Evangelical candidates nor to take over the government to the exclusion of other religions. While working to curtail the influence of pornography, Moral Majority did not advocate censorship. Neither was it the organization's objective to deprive homosexuals of civil rights as explicitly delineated in the Constitution. Likewise, neither did Moral Majority intend to castigate as necessarily immoral those with whom the organization disagreed.
The sincere believer would be hard pressed to find fault with Moral Majority's initial motivations and agenda. However, as Dobson and Thomas readily admit, the scope of the agenda aimed for was broader than any one organization could hope to effectively address. Even more importantly, the sorts of issues that Moral Majority decided to focus upon were not necessarily of the sort where significant change could be effected from the top down. Rather, for such profound societal change to take root, it would most likely need to be from the bottom up.
By Frederick Meekins
Monday, August 04, 2025
Will Religious Internationalists Coopt Bicentennial To Foment White Guilt?
Will Religious Internationalists Coopt Bicentennial To Foment White Guilt?https://t.co/gfqa77CET0
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 3, 2025
Advertisement Condemned For Failing To Highlight Butchy Minority
Advertisement Condemned For Failing To Highlight Butchy Minorityhttps://t.co/FUFmNoLm2P
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 3, 2025
Ramaswamy Refuses To Concede Contemporary Migrants Undermine America More Often Than Not
Ramaswamy Refuses To Concede Contemporary Migrants Undermine America More Often Than Nothttps://t.co/c0B1zKIuDM
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 3, 2025
Know It All Philosopher Insists God Really Doesn’t Know It All
Know It All Philosopher Insists God Really Doesn’t Know It All
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) August 3, 2025 at 7:07 PM
[image or embed]
Erotic Projectile Discomboluates Lady Ball Handlers
Erotic Projectile Discomboluates Lady Ball Handlers
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) August 3, 2025 at 7:05 PM
[image or embed]
Plague Cult Alchemy More About Cultivating Obedience Than Saving Lives
Plague Cult Alchemy More About Cultivating Obedience Than Saving Liveshttps://t.co/nKrQBxuTEf
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 3, 2025
Transhumanism, The Nephilim, & The End Times
Transhumanism, The Nephilim, & The End Timeshttps://t.co/ImK8aonpOT
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) August 3, 2025
Are Cryptoterrestrials Already On Earth Plotting Humanity’s Overthrow?
Are Cryptoterrestrials Already On Earth Already Plotting Humanity’s Overthrow?https://t.co/N4hTjz7jNj
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) July 31, 2025
WIll Living Plastics Serve As Basis Of Martian Shelters?
WIll Living Plastics Serve As Basis Of Martian Shelters?
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) July 31, 2025 at 6:32 PM
[image or embed]
Critics Baffled Why Audiences Prefer The Popular Marvel Characters Rather Than Ones Barely Known Even By Comics Diehards
Critics Baffled Why Audiences Prefer The Popular Marvel Characters Rather Than Ones Barely Known Even By Comics Diehards
— Issachar Institute (@issacharinstitute.bsky.social) July 31, 2025 at 6:27 PM
[image or embed]
Gynosupremacists Insisting No Man Good Enough Outraged When Men Exercise Similar Degree Of Discretion
Gynosupremacists Insisting No Man Good Enough Outraged When Men Exercise Similar Degree Of Discretionhttps://t.co/ou9dIMMofy
— epistolizer (@epistolizer) July 31, 2025
Sunday, August 03, 2025
Are Whites Obligated To Cleave Unto Demographics Bent On Eliminating Them?
Wouldn’t want to be a part of it as I am not a group person.
It sounds like you have to be voted in and I am the sort of person most people despise and don’t want to be around.
But do the tolerancemongers opposed to this plan to speak out against Hebrewist enclaves in New York or the propaganda touting patronage of minority or female owned businesses?
Do they intend to silence their mouths in speaking out against “gentrification” of certain urban hovels?
Should similar Islamist compounds be as critically scrutinized?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)