Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Sometimes Striking A Child Should Be Appropriate

A Maryland substitute teacher was suspended for striking a student with a belt in order to break up a fight.

Perhaps those that have been duped into the you should never touch a child delusion should have allowed the ruffians to beat each other to death.

At least that way there would have been fewer mouths to feed on the school lunch roster and further contamination of the gene pool in a few short years could have been avoided.

On a more serious note, at the time critics were insisting that the pedagogue should have modeled proper deference to the state's designated public safety personnel and operatives in neutralizing threats to life, property, and good order.

Since this story broke, the nation has seen the results of what can happen when citizens are less than proactive or engaged in their own protection.

If it is inappropriate for a teacher to strike a child with a belt in a moment of emergency, why is it acceptable for a police or security officer to taser, pepperspray, or baton the disruptive and noncompliant other than this is how the population has been mentally conditioned?

By Frederick Meekins

Propagandistic Tylenol Commercial Enough To Make You Sick

Click On The Headline

Amidst Diocesean Collapse Episcopal Bishop Admits To No Longer Believing In The Trinity

Click On The Headline

Why Is The Pope Seeking Scientific Advice From A Philosophical Pantheist?

Click On The Headline

Republicans Mocked For Considering That Charleston Terrorist Attack Also Had A Religious Angle

Click On The Headline

Anglicans & Lutherans Panel Discussion

Click On The headline

Yet Another Southern Baptist Functionary Blames All Of The World’s Troubles On The White Devils

Click On The Headline

Will Independent Baptists Prove As Spineless As Southern Baptists In Defending The Confederate Flag?

Click On The Headline

Postmodernism: The Age Of Nihilism

Click ON The Headline

Ebay Equates Confederate Flags With Narcotics, Human Organs & Hardcore Pornography

Click On The Headline

Obama Insists God Unconcerned For The Unborn

Click On The Headline

Dead ISIS Sex Slaves Fed To Dogs

Click On The Headline

The New Evangelical Left

Click On The Headline

Does Pope Francis Profit From Gun Trade He Damns?

Click On The Headline

Trayvon’s Apostle Paul Pounds Highways Stoking Gospel Of White Genocide

Click On The Headline

Monday, June 22, 2015

Jenner Deserves No More Respect & Admiration Than Dolezal

In a piece appearing in the Washington Times, columnist Walter Williams assured readers that he would refer to Bruce Jenner as a “she”.

Would the pundit extend the same courtesy to NAACP functionary Rachel Dolezal by referring to her as Black rather than White?

Some might respond that Dolezal lied but Jenner did not.

Mind you, these are likely some of the same people that insist that race does not exist and that the color of skin no more intrinsic to one's identity than one's hair color.

Well, you can change hair color, can you not?

The entire hair dye industry is built upon that reality.

In his moment upon the stage of redemptive history, Pontius Pilate snorted what is truth.

If a man can mutilate himself, strut around like a circus clown, retain for now the very appendage symbolizing the ontological state the individual has alleged to renounce while insisting to be a woman, how is that embracing the truth?

It is no more truthful than a White woman masquerading as Black.

By Frederick Meekins

The Philosophy Of Mnd Uploading

Click On The Headline

The Carnally Depraved Demand Government-Provided Orgy Chamber

Click On The Headline

Are You Racist If You Do Not Allow Yourself To Be Murdered Willingly By A Black Person?

Click On The Headline

Is The World On The Brink Of A Mass Extinction Event?

Click On The Headline

Are Whites Obligated To Apologize To Unattacked Churches?

Click On The Headline

Trayvonites Perpetrate Hate Crime Against Historic Monument

Click On The Headline

Would Rove Undermine The Second Amendment?

Click On The Headline

Will The Next Next Generation Incorporate Elements Of Stargate Universe?

Click On The Headline

Coral Ridge Presbyterian Pastor Resigns Amidst Adultery Scandal

Click On The Headline

Are Bill Clinton & Al Gore Guilty Of Hate Thought?

Click On The Headline

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Website Applauding Moral Decline Laments Loss Of Foo Foo Manners

A Huffington Post story listed a number of polite things people don't do anymore.

One was giving up your seat for an elderly person, pregnant woman, or someone with disabilities.

For starters, if these demographic categories make a fuss about wanting to be treated like everybody else, that should also include the expectation that they should also wait for a seat like everybody else.

Another principle included taking off your hat indoors.

Does that also include those belonging to a certain religion with a penchant for flying jetliners into skyscrapers that not only cover their heads but at times even their entire faces?

If multiculturalism holds that all people are to be treated equally and these people are not obligated to remove their cranial apparel, why should the rest of us be expected to comply with such a decree?

Another principle on the list was about making small talk in the checkout line.

I am there to acquire a desired or needed item.

Beyond a nod or cursory verbalized greeting, I am not there to talk to people.

Given the outright destruction of property that often takes place these days as a result of either athletic victories or unpopular jury verdicts, one would think a little good natured benign detachment would be applauded as a form of serene civility.

By Frederick Meekins

Noah Hutchings Passes Away

Click On The Headline

UN Downplays Rapacious Lusts Of So-Called Peacekeepers

Click On The Headline

Pay Your Bus Fare If You Don’t Want To Be Pepper Sprayed

Click On The Headline

Will The Pentagon Engineer A Dinosaur Cavalry?

Click On The Headline

Southern Baptist Elites Elect White President Despite Insisting Character Determined By Color Of Skin

Click On The Headline

Michael Savage Speculates If Pope Francis Is The False Prophet Of The Apocalypse

Click On The Headline

Italian Parents Protest Compulsory Scholastic Transvestitism

Click On The Headline

Hyacinth Grubb Reflects Upon What’s In A Name

Click On The Headline

Terrorist Massacres Bible Study

Click On The Headline

Monday, June 15, 2015

Ethicist Fuddles The Differences Between Genocide & Infanticide

During a lecture titled “Ethics In The Age Of Terror & Genocide”, an astute member of the audience observed during the question and answer portion of the presentation how many Americans recoil in outrage at the concept of genocide but are morally comfortable with abortion.

It was interesting to hear the lecturer wiggle herself out of the conundrum by invoking the technicality that genocide is the killing of people because they are members of a particular group while abortion does not necessarily target the victim for extermination for that particular reason.

That is, of course, unless you are a confirmed Sangerian.

According to the logic elaborated in the response, it is only wrong to eliminate groups and not necessarily individuals.

The propagandist proceeded to elaborate a number of criteria separating abortion from genocide.

Among these were the rights of the woman and how the unborn child is not a human life that can exist on its own.

But how are these appreciably different than the justifications invoked by the Nazis such as living space for the German people and that the inhabitants of these targeted areas weren't really humans capable of surviving on their own either by the standards of that particular regime?

By Frederick Meekins

Is Ingesting Cheese Composed Of Human DNA A Form Of Cannibalism?

Click On The Headline

Toddlers Paraded Before Deviants

Click On The Headline

Did Carnality Abound On The Brady Bunch Set?

Click On The Headline

Conservative Catholics Admit Francis A Possible Pinko

Click On The Headline

Otherkin Movement Claims Some Entities Mistakenly Born Into Human Bodies

Click On The Headline

Media Coverage Of Atheism

Click On The Headline

Deluded Darwinians Claim Humans No More Valuable Than Animals

Click On The Headline

Are Miley Cryrus’ Blasphemous Outbursts The Result Of Disney Mind Control Experimentation?

Click On The Headline

Will Preserved Dinosaur Blood Demolish The Old Earth Hypothesis?

Click On The Headline

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Friday, June 12, 2015

Is Dana Perino The Covergirl Of Politically Correct Republicanism?

On The Five, Dana Perino suggested that professional athletics associations ought to finance a public relations effort (also commonly referred to as a propaganda campaign) urging inner city youth to respect and comply with law enforcement.

There is nothing wrong with such a message.

However, even if these enterprises have these funds at their disposal, they are not obligated to provide such outreach.

They are not a church or a related kind of philanthropic organization.

The responsibility of such is to provide entertainment.

As a multimillionaire in her own right, why doesn't Dana Perino finance such cultural conditioning?

Regarding the principal fired for posting online for suggesting that the police officer at the pool party didn't really do anything wrong, Dana Perino on the Five suggested that those kinds of comments should perhaps have been said around the dinner table and not enunciated publicly.

But doesn't this degree of self censorship plant the seeds of a regime where one will eventually be carted off to a reeducation camp for precisely verbalizing these errant thoughts in the privacy of one's own home?

By Frederick Meekins

Whites Better Off Avoiding Interaction With Trayvonites

Click On The Headline

Will McDonald’s Protect White Customers From Rampaging Obama Voters?

Click On The Headline

Serious Thinkers No Longer Consider Chesterton A Buffoon

Click On The Headline

Miley Cyrus Calls For Pogrom Against Christians

Click On The Headline