Sunday, March 31, 2019

Angel Holding Child

Photo by Frederick Meekins

Click On The Headline

Police Tactics Little Better Than Explicit Terrorism

Click On The Headline

Jurisprudence Clarified In The Case Of Who Smelled It Vs Who Dealt It

Click On The Headline

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Bladder Busting Apparently The Ultimate Power Of The Infinity Gauntlet

Click On The Headline

Diversity Fanatics Manipulate History Not For Education But To Advance Agenda Narrative

There is no pleasing diversity fanatics.

These subversives constantly harp the shortcomings of the past in the hopes of disgusting the otherwise undiscerning into going along with the pending revolution to collapse what remains of America's constitutional liberties.

Now, the First Lady of Virginia Pamela Northam is accused of a thought crime for handling a legislative page a piece of cotton during a tour of the Governor's Mansion and asking the student to imagine what it would be like to be enslaved and forced to pick that all day.

Is not that the entire point of history, to try and better understand as much as possible what those in he past endured?

One must ask then what exactly was it that Mrs. Northam did so wrong?

Try and prompt someone to try and think for themselves rather than reflexively respond in a manner as commanded by social engineers?

A complaint letter --- not even written by one of the students to whom the cotton was handed which also included Whites as well ---- states that the First Lady of Virginia's presentation made one of the delicate snowflakes within eartshot “uncomfortable”.

So how is that worse than what the average American feels every time these regrettable transgressions of the past are invoked to justify developments such as looting after unpopular trial verdicts and the expansion of social programs that will plunge the nation further into a debt spiral from which it will likely never recover?

So what is it going to be?

Are we going to reemphasize the negativity of the past to the point where the positive things we do have as a country are forgotten or are we to ignore them entirely because some have so pandered to the aggrieved so spoiled by unmerited concessions that the fawning attention demanded now overwhelms them?

By Frederick Meekins

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Monday, March 25, 2019

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Sunday, March 17, 2019

The Final Frontier: International Relations and Politics through Star Trek and Star Wars

Click On The Headline

Toy Ship

Photo by Frederick Meekins

Click On The Headline

Monday, March 11, 2019

Thursday, March 07, 2019

Reformation Insights Into Social Media

Click On The Headline

Wednesday, March 06, 2019

St. Patrick and Mary

Photo by Frederick Meekins

Click On The Headline

Understanding Cults

Click On The Headline

Theological Ignoramuses Toss Fit Over Private Church Sign

Click On The Headline

Monday, March 04, 2019

Why It Is Important To Get American History Correct

Click On The Headline

Camo Truck

Photo by Frederick Meekins

Click On The Headine

Sunday, March 03, 2019

Tan Motorcycle

Photo by Frederick Meekins

Click On The Headline

Saturday, March 02, 2019

Cat In Dress

Photo by Frederick Meekins

Click On The Headline

Reparations A Down Payment On National Decline

History teaches that, when candidates are swept into office largely as a result of promising the electorate significant outlays from the treasury, the particular regime in question is at its death knell and on the verge of collapse.

In an attempt to pander to Blacks in this sort of manner, Elizabeth Warren --- identified by Reuters in the account of this policy proposal as White so we can be relieved that the leftist press has settled this brouhaha as to whether or not she's actually an American Indian --- has come out in favor of reparations.

In particular, the Senator is backing legislation that would assist minorities in making a down payment on a house.

But if it is wrong to deny someone access to housing on the basis of race, why is it right to assist an individual to procure housing when it is obvious that the person does not deserve to own a house on the basis of meritorious achievement?

Conversely, why is a Rustbelt or Appalachian White barely getting by as a box store cashier obligated to provide the taxes so the likes of Jussie Smollet, Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson can be provided a down payment on a house?

If targeted populations were lavished with these handouts, would they shut up once and for all regarding historic mistreatments they never directly suffered or will they continue to invoke these in the ongoing attempt to extort additional concessions from gullible and easily manipulated Whites?

Providing government housing to vast swathes of the population benefits neither those it is lavished upon nor the areas in which such individuals come to reside.

The squalor endemic to numerous public housing projects is testament to this truth.

If Elizabeth Warren really was an Indian, you'd think she'd already be familiar with this sad reality.

By Frederick Meekins

Whites Condemned For Not Squandering Wealth On Swanky Shoes, Gold Teeth and Hair Extensions

Click On The Headline