Sunday, August 05, 2012
The mass casualty incident at the Sikh temple in Wisconsin cannot be described as anything other than an act of terrorism. However, had the tragedy involved a group of less exotic Americans, would media and law enforcement have been as prompt in categorizing it as such? There are a number in those respective professions that still won't call the attack on Fort Hood such several years later.
Saturday, August 04, 2012
Friday, August 03, 2012
The Center For Science In The Public Interest, the pro-starvation lobby sucking the enjoyment out of life lobby, has a list of items in categorizes as "food porn". If these gastronomic delights are to be categorized as such, as certain strands of liberalism insist, it is no one's business what we eat behind the closed doors of our bedrooms or (perhaps in this case) our kitchens. Taking this analogy to the standard defense of pornography to its logical conclusion, if one can get some college professor to get such junk food labeled as masterpieces of culinary expression, shouldn't the establishments making such fare available be given government grant money?
Thursday, August 02, 2012
In the 80's and 90's at certain Christian schools, one was almost given the impression that one could be booted out for copping to shopping at K-Mart (or perhaps for even watching The Simpsons). Will it now be insinuated that students might not be worthy of membership in their respective student bodies if they eat anywhere other than Chick-Fillet?
Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Is it really so wrong to strategically position oneself to vanquish a weaker opponent and slowly accumulate power before achieving ultimate victory? Perhaps the Asian Olympians are being punished not so much for throwing a match or for unwittingly exposing to unsuspecting Western viewers the conniving nature of the Oriental mind?
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Those Christians that badmouth individuality, droning on that the true believer defers to church as embodying the wisdom of the group, don't really have a leg to stand on in condemning a church in the deep south that would not allow a Black couple to get married in their building. They should actually applaud the decision if the individual really is to yield to the group for no other reason in regards to those issues not clearly spelled out in the pages of Holy Scripture simply because it is the group or COMMUNITY that must take precedence.
So if the U.S. beats the Chinese in terms of Olympic medals, will our system of training (where athletes provide for their own training instead of it being provided in near concentration camp conditions) finally be heralded as superior? If athletes from behind the Iron and Bamboo Curtains didn't look so pleased at the prospects of U.S. Olympic victory, it was not so much because of the prospect of losing but probably out of fear probably being beaten afterwards by their tyrannical taskmasters.
Monday, July 30, 2012
Sunday, July 29, 2012
On the radio as I awoke, I heard a commercial for something called the "Rebuilding Christendom Conference". While that sounds well and good, since this is primarily a Catholic organization that boldly declares on its website "Towards a Vision Of Reconstruction Amidst The Ruins", would Protestants be allowed a place of freedom within their New World Order? It must be asked since the Vatican did remphasize or clarify recently that Protestants weren't even to be extended status or respect as an actual church.
Friday, July 27, 2012
Batman Shooter A Neuroscientist That Went Haywire
So will the media issue numerous exposes and reports how this individual had likely been subjected for years to evolutionary dogma how human beings are nothing more than an accidental conglomeration of chemicals and electricity?
Leftists will remark that such insinuations are offensive and irresponsible.
But are such claims any more so than those of ABC news correspondents hoping that the act of terror was Tea Party related?
Such an insinuation was bandied back and forth between Brian Ross and George Stephanopolous.
If the gunman had been named Abdul Hassan, would this journalistic outlet had latched onto the first one they could find especially if an activist with the local chapter of CAIR?
Thinking from more conservative voices was no less muddled.
Responding as additional information was made available to the general public, Brain Wilson of WMAL radio remarked it was good news that it seemed likely that the shooter was a “lone wolf” not connected to international terrorism.
But how is a victim any less mangled or dead if shot by a loner or by someone more inherently group oriented such as a member of a gang or terrorist organization?
Sophisticates will opine that this deed does not rise to the level of terrorism.
But why not?
When I first took an interest in this subject over twenty years ago, terrorism was defined as an act of violence committed for the purposes of garnering attention to get people to alter their behavior or shift their perceptions.
If not terrorism, what else do you call an attack with the purposes of attaching forever in a sick and twisted way one’s name to one of America’s most beloved cultural icons and literary characters?
by Frederick Meekins
