Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Monday, March 11, 2019
Saturday, March 09, 2019
Friday, March 08, 2019
Arkansas Flag Reinterpreted To Pander To Indians Rather Than Honor Confederacy
Thursday, March 07, 2019
Wednesday, March 06, 2019
Tuesday, March 05, 2019
Monday, March 04, 2019
Sunday, March 03, 2019
Saturday, March 02, 2019
Reparations A Down Payment On National Decline
In an attempt to pander to Blacks in this sort of manner, Elizabeth Warren --- identified by Reuters in the account of this policy proposal as White so we can be relieved that the leftist press has settled this brouhaha as to whether or not she's actually an American Indian --- has come out in favor of reparations.
In particular, the Senator is backing legislation that would assist minorities in making a down payment on a house.
But if it is wrong to deny someone access to housing on the basis of race, why is it right to assist an individual to procure housing when it is obvious that the person does not deserve to own a house on the basis of meritorious achievement?
Conversely, why is a Rustbelt or Appalachian White barely getting by as a box store cashier obligated to provide the taxes so the likes of Jussie Smollet, Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson can be provided a down payment on a house?
If targeted populations were lavished with these handouts, would they shut up once and for all regarding historic mistreatments they never directly suffered or will they continue to invoke these in the ongoing attempt to extort additional concessions from gullible and easily manipulated Whites?
Providing government housing to vast swathes of the population benefits neither those it is lavished upon nor the areas in which such individuals come to reside.
The squalor endemic to numerous public housing projects is testament to this truth.
If Elizabeth Warren really was an Indian, you'd think she'd already be familiar with this sad reality.
By Frederick Meekins
Friday, March 01, 2019
Thursday, February 28, 2019
Sunday, February 24, 2019
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Friday, February 22, 2019
Vocations Of Magistrate & Missionary Divergent At Core
However, with the Trump Presidency, it has become evident that what is meant by that admonition is that those that hold to traditional notions of piety are instead obligated to surrender to leftwing policy proposals.
This is particularly evident in an article posted at CNN.com titled “Why evangelicals should rethink Trump gospel”.
For example, the article says, “The Great Commission assumes the the faithful make disciples everywhere, including so-called S-hole countries.”
No Christian says otherwise.
However, the vocation of the President is not that of the frontline missionary.
The role of the President foremostly is to protect the well being of the nation he governs and those legally dwelling within its boundaries.
Nowhere in Scripture are entire nations obligated to lower their standard of living because others are insufficiently governed.
One of the most prominent critics of the Trump Presidency is none other than Pope Francis.
So before CNN gets on its high horse about Evangelical voters, if the Pope is such a fan of unbridled immigration and refugees, shouldn't the world's most influential media organization ask why the physical holdings of the Vatican are not being utilized to house these weary souls but instead remain open as what is essentially one of the world's oldest tourist traps?
God is not the one that needs those finely furnished structures.
After all, Acts 7:48 assures that God does not dwell in houses built by the hands of man.
Perhaps as the alleged Vicar of Christ, it is about time the Pope did the same.
By Frederick Meekins
