Commentary Telling It Like It Is To Those That Might Not Want To Hear It & Links To News Around The Internet
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
Monday, April 20, 2015
Should Allegiance To Certain Church Movements Excuse Profound Moral Failings?
A valid observation.
Sort of like the time Hyles concocted a convoluted doctrine not unlike that of Mormon celestial marriage to justify him spending more emotionally intimate time with the church secretary than his actual wife.
Then there was also the time Hyles summoned the deacons to the pulpit and had them vow before the congregation how these church officers were willing to take a bullet if so directed by the pastor.
Will the church bulletin be providing edifying Chesterton quotes in the upcoming weeks and months as well?
Likely not.
For the wisdom of this journalist will likely be disqualified for such an honor because of his ultimate conversion to Roman Catholicism.
For you see, in the brand of Christianity that celebrates ecclesiastical separation as something akin to a prime directive, it is not enough for a thinker to have enunciated an observation or proposition exuding truth.
Often, it is even more important that the intellectual under consideration hold membership in the right organizations and avoid contact with movements condemned as beyond a narrow pale of acceptability.
How else under the lofty identity of Fundamental Independent Baptist can one justify promoting a ministry that has profoundly harmed unnumbered throngs while likely numbering among history's reprobates some of the most gifted writers to ever contemplate the human condition?
By Frederick Meekins
Is The New World Order Attempting To Starve Americans In Martial Law Exercise?
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Saturday, April 18, 2015
Friday, April 17, 2015
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Should Church Members Submit To Pastoral Interogations?
In an interview on Generation’s Radio, Albert Martin --- former pastor of Trinity Baptist Church in Montville, New Jersey --- elaborated fondly that over the course of his ministry there that it was the practice to inflict upon the members of the congregation an annual inspection in their homes.
During this interrogation, he would gather intelligence as to the spiritual state of the occupants. His interlocutories would assess areas such devotional life, quality of marriage, and the extent to which the residents were “integrated” into the church.
And what if a church member refuses to allow a member of church leadership into their home?
So long as a member is not bedding someone other than their mate, leaving bruises on a spouse, or does not themselves instigate a request for assistance from the church, is the state of your marriage or what goes on in your home really any of the pastor’s business?
by Frederick Meekins
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
In a sermon on Christian apathy, fanatic legalist Jason Cooley condemned the entire U.S. military over the actions of a few errant soldiers. Therefore, extrapolating the pastor’s logic, ought we to condemn the entire Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement for its errant sex crimes that are comparable to any Vatican debaucheries?
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Tolerancemongers Police Jeb Bush's Racial Background
Apart from kowtowing to threats of mob violence, there really isn't much of anything that can be done about his claim.
For you see, acceptable definitions of the demographic categorization include individuals who self-identify as Latino and who share a language or cultural heritage.
Jeb speaks fluent Spanish and married a Mexican woman.
In a number of his policies, he favors his adopted compatriots over his genetic kinsman.
Shouldn't America be more outraged that here, well into the 21st century, that voter identification procedures still collect intelligence as to a citizen's racial or ethnic background?
Furthermore, what about these Hispanosupremacists now insisting that they do not want any of “HIS KIND” (meaning Jeb Bush) to consider themselves among their number?
Isn't this a greater outrage than Ross Perot uttering “You people” at an NAACP rally?
Even more importantly, how is this appreciably different than the Nazis that would disqualify for membership in the Volk or COMMUNITY anyone they deemed polluted or contaminated by so called “Jewish blood”?
by Frederick Meekins
