Source: amazon.com via Frederick on Pinterest
Thursday, August 02, 2012
Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Is it really so wrong to strategically position oneself to vanquish a weaker opponent and slowly accumulate power before achieving ultimate victory? Perhaps the Asian Olympians are being punished not so much for throwing a match or for unwittingly exposing to unsuspecting Western viewers the conniving nature of the Oriental mind?
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Those Christians that badmouth individuality, droning on that the true believer defers to church as embodying the wisdom of the group, don't really have a leg to stand on in condemning a church in the deep south that would not allow a Black couple to get married in their building. They should actually applaud the decision if the individual really is to yield to the group for no other reason in regards to those issues not clearly spelled out in the pages of Holy Scripture simply because it is the group or COMMUNITY that must take precedence.
So if the U.S. beats the Chinese in terms of Olympic medals, will our system of training (where athletes provide for their own training instead of it being provided in near concentration camp conditions) finally be heralded as superior? If athletes from behind the Iron and Bamboo Curtains didn't look so pleased at the prospects of U.S. Olympic victory, it was not so much because of the prospect of losing but probably out of fear probably being beaten afterwards by their tyrannical taskmasters.
Monday, July 30, 2012
Sunday, July 29, 2012
On the radio as I awoke, I heard a commercial for something called the "Rebuilding Christendom Conference". While that sounds well and good, since this is primarily a Catholic organization that boldly declares on its website "Towards a Vision Of Reconstruction Amidst The Ruins", would Protestants be allowed a place of freedom within their New World Order? It must be asked since the Vatican did remphasize or clarify recently that Protestants weren't even to be extended status or respect as an actual church.
Friday, July 27, 2012
Batman Shooter A Neuroscientist That Went Haywire
It seems that the Batman Shooter may be a neuroscientist that went haywire.
So will the media issue numerous exposes and reports how this individual had likely been subjected for years to evolutionary dogma how human beings are nothing more than an accidental conglomeration of chemicals and electricity?
Leftists will remark that such insinuations are offensive and irresponsible.
But are such claims any more so than those of ABC news correspondents hoping that the act of terror was Tea Party related?
Such an insinuation was bandied back and forth between Brian Ross and George Stephanopolous.
If the gunman had been named Abdul Hassan, would this journalistic outlet had latched onto the first one they could find especially if an activist with the local chapter of CAIR?
Thinking from more conservative voices was no less muddled.
Responding as additional information was made available to the general public, Brain Wilson of WMAL radio remarked it was good news that it seemed likely that the shooter was a “lone wolf” not connected to international terrorism.
But how is a victim any less mangled or dead if shot by a loner or by someone more inherently group oriented such as a member of a gang or terrorist organization?
Sophisticates will opine that this deed does not rise to the level of terrorism.
But why not?
When I first took an interest in this subject over twenty years ago, terrorism was defined as an act of violence committed for the purposes of garnering attention to get people to alter their behavior or shift their perceptions.
If not terrorism, what else do you call an attack with the purposes of attaching forever in a sick and twisted way one’s name to one of America’s most beloved cultural icons and literary characters?
by Frederick Meekins
The impression I am getting from certain hyperlegalists is that, to the Christian, the life of the mind is to be as mundane as common everyday existence. For nothing that does not exist in the everyday world ought to be permitted to exist in the realm of the imagination either. It seems that would include scientific advancements as well. I was informed that science was occultic (as they proceeded to instruct me on the matter through a scientific device known as a computer). Movies produced by these people must be a real hoot or a thriller. I suppose such cinematic master pieces would consist of little more than a two hour prayer meeting.
A cover story on an issue of Ebony Magazine read "Black Wealth". Given that the publication is geared towards Black folks, are its readers so racially narcissistic that they have no interest in money unless the article tickles their sense of ethnic superiority? What about a magazine titled Alabaster with an article on “White Wealth”?
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Rahm Emanuel says Chick Filet is not in keeping with Chicago's values. And what exactly do those consist of? Widespread municipal corruption? So are we to assume that the Nation of Islam minions to prowl the city in the attempt to curb the skyrocketing homicide rate (another Chicago value?) represent the virtues embodied by that particular Midwestern metropolis? So apparently you aren't welcome in Chicago if you oppose gay marriage, but its arms are open wide to you if you believe that White people were created by a Satanic genetic engineer and that there is a giant flying saucer hovering above the Earth that will one day rain nuclear annihilation down upon unsuspecting White people whose only crime was having been born White?
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
A number of Christians I have been sparring with on a social network site have condemned science as a false religion because of the questionable spiritual backgrounds of that epistemological methodologies foremost practitioners. Then perhaps Christian youths should instead be encouraged to pursue callings in these fields and in the creative areas that reflect upon the implications of these fields instead of constantly beaten over the head into becoming foreign missionaries. How about fighting for our own culture for a change instead of glamorizing the pygmies overseas?
A clarification. Man is a animal (particularly a mamma) biologically but distinct from animals ontologically. That does not conflict with a literalist seven day view of creation. Like mammals, humans are warm-blooded, grow hair, and produce live young which are usually fed by milk from their mothers when born. Admitting humans are animals in this sense no more undermines the unique nature of man being made in the image of God than does admitting that man is composed physically of matter. Only heretics such as Gnostics deny that the material component of man is as essential as the spiritual at least in the world in which he now finds himself.
An Exopolitical Perspective On Transhumanism, Part 1
Listen to internet radio with Ohio Exopolitics on Blog Talk Radio
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)