Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Those Christians that badmouth individuality, droning on that the true believer defers to church as embodying the wisdom of the group, don't really have a leg to stand on in condemning a church in the deep south that would not allow a Black couple to get married in their building. They should actually applaud the decision if the individual really is to yield to the group for no other reason in regards to those issues not clearly spelled out in the pages of Holy Scripture simply because it is the group or COMMUNITY that must take precedence.
So if the U.S. beats the Chinese in terms of Olympic medals, will our system of training (where athletes provide for their own training instead of it being provided in near concentration camp conditions) finally be heralded as superior? If athletes from behind the Iron and Bamboo Curtains didn't look so pleased at the prospects of U.S. Olympic victory, it was not so much because of the prospect of losing but probably out of fear probably being beaten afterwards by their tyrannical taskmasters.
Monday, July 30, 2012
Sunday, July 29, 2012
On the radio as I awoke, I heard a commercial for something called the "Rebuilding Christendom Conference". While that sounds well and good, since this is primarily a Catholic organization that boldly declares on its website "Towards a Vision Of Reconstruction Amidst The Ruins", would Protestants be allowed a place of freedom within their New World Order? It must be asked since the Vatican did remphasize or clarify recently that Protestants weren't even to be extended status or respect as an actual church.
Friday, July 27, 2012
Batman Shooter A Neuroscientist That Went Haywire
So will the media issue numerous exposes and reports how this individual had likely been subjected for years to evolutionary dogma how human beings are nothing more than an accidental conglomeration of chemicals and electricity?
Leftists will remark that such insinuations are offensive and irresponsible.
But are such claims any more so than those of ABC news correspondents hoping that the act of terror was Tea Party related?
Such an insinuation was bandied back and forth between Brian Ross and George Stephanopolous.
If the gunman had been named Abdul Hassan, would this journalistic outlet had latched onto the first one they could find especially if an activist with the local chapter of CAIR?
Thinking from more conservative voices was no less muddled.
Responding as additional information was made available to the general public, Brain Wilson of WMAL radio remarked it was good news that it seemed likely that the shooter was a “lone wolf” not connected to international terrorism.
But how is a victim any less mangled or dead if shot by a loner or by someone more inherently group oriented such as a member of a gang or terrorist organization?
Sophisticates will opine that this deed does not rise to the level of terrorism.
But why not?
When I first took an interest in this subject over twenty years ago, terrorism was defined as an act of violence committed for the purposes of garnering attention to get people to alter their behavior or shift their perceptions.
If not terrorism, what else do you call an attack with the purposes of attaching forever in a sick and twisted way one’s name to one of America’s most beloved cultural icons and literary characters?
by Frederick Meekins
