Apparently women that don’t cook from scratch are failures for violating
Biblical admonitions regarding taking care of their families because
processed foods and preservatives are not mentioned in Scripture.
Utilizing such logic, does that make one a failure as a man if you
cannot get his woman to comply with this objective? More importantly,
aren’t you a failure if you propagate your decree by any method other
than the sort of parchments upon which the original canonical texts were
written upon? It is at this point where the condemnation starts
rolling in for hashing out where such presuppositions end up.
To keep the flames of racial animosity and resentment stoked, the
Washington Post published a supplement 9/4/19 titled “Teaching Slavery”.
An interesting fact contained within was that at one point in his life
Ulysses S. Grant owned slaves. As such, shouldn’t all statues of him on
public land and in parks be removed? And if Andrew Jackson must be
removed from the twenty dollar bill over his shortcomings in terms of
race relations to be replaced by Harriet Tubman, shouldn’t Grant be
similarly removed from the $50 and replaced with someone like Frederick
Douglas or Sojourner Truth?
National Review has published an analysis titled “Walmart’s Retreat On
Guns Means Woke Capitalism Is Here To Stay”. Ironic that those
supporting this use of corporate policy to alter the ethical landscape
by denying access to perfectly legal products used to rampage the most
about the impropriety of someone imposing their morality upon someone
else.
An infant changing table was erected in the stall of a men’s room. On it
was a warning reading, “Never leave children unattended.” Yet neither
of these things were that worthy of note. What leapt out about the
situation was that the warning was printed on the hygenic fixture in
Braille. The blind of course need to change their children like anybody
else. But are you going to tell me that they are going to run their
hands all over the changing table in pursuit of that message?
Home school activist Kevin Swanson admonished believers not to grumble
about persecution and tyranny. No doubt he would have also believed the
wrought iron words on the camp gate “Work set you free”.
So are these global warming brats going to surrender their posh
lifestyles and pursue careers of subsistence agriculture rather than
degrees in useless academic majors such as minority or gender studies?
Outrage has erupted over anyone that has responded to Greta Thunberg and
her brand of Young Pioneers with anything other than abject
acquiescence. WiIl similar condemnation be leveled at the pedagogues
and propagandists that manipulated her into such a froth in the first
place?
Outrage has erupted against those that have given anything but the
benefit of the doubt to Young Pioneer Greta Thunberg. Yet these are no
doubt the same ones that rhetorically called for the scalp of the Maga
hat Catholic lad that did nothing more than look on with a perplexed
smirk on his face as some American Indian beat a drum in his face like
some sort of lunatic.
If at 16, Greta Thunberg is apparently too young to handle criticism of
her call for planetary revolution and the upending of the contemporary
socioeconomic system, why ought we to assume that those of the same age
are capable of deciding matters of abortion and contraception for
themselves?
If Greta Thunberg and her band of Young Pioneers are really all that
concerned about pending environmental collapse, why did they nor prevent
the unnecessary expenditure of fossil fuels by addressing Congress and
the United Nations through virtual telepresence rather than by personal
appearance?
If authorities across Europe punish Christian parents homeschooling
their children over violating compulsory attendance laws, why aren’t the
parents of Greta Thunberg as vigorously prosecuted for being even more
neglectful for allowing her to miss academic instructional time in favor
of subversive activism?
If Comrade Thunberg is going to invoke autism as an excuse to deflect
analysis of her policy proposals, what is so wrong with pointing out she
has a mental illness? Doesn’t her sort constantly remind the general
population of their neurological state when attempting to get their
handouts denied everybody else and at times even why they should not be
required to abide by the standards of conduct by which the remainder of
us are expected to comport ourselves?
Outrage has erupted over a Michigan ruling deciding that faith-based
adoption agencies can refuse to place children with gay prospective
parents. Will those feigning concern over the civil liberties
implications of such a verdict get as jacked out of shape over religious
foster parents and assorted childcare providers forbidden from teaching
the youth in their care as to what constitutes a morally proper family
and carnal relations?
In criticizing the feminist criticism of the Joker film, Rush Limbaugh
closed his morning update remarking in regards to comic book movies that
these productions are signs that people need to grow up. What about
himself? Limbaugh is the one that has had four wives, the latest nearly
thirty years younger than himself. Limbaugh ridicules entertainment
derived from comics. Yet he is on the record as being such a fan of the
series 24 that there exists a photo of him just about playing tonsil
hockey with the actress that portrayed the character Chloe when both
appeared at a Heritage Foundation panel discussion examining the
conservative fan base that developed surrounding that drama. Can it
explained how Jack Bauer is any different than Batman or at least the
Punisher?
By Frederick Meekins
