Thursday, September 30, 2010

Louisville area schools plan to integrate along income rather than racial lines. This should spark even greater outrage. In most cases, you can look at a person and tell what race they are. However, to hand down decisions as to financial status, one has to dig into private matters that the education establishment has no business asking or make the kinds of exaggerated stereotypes that tolerancemongers always assure us are inaccurate when they disadvantage their particular special interest or front group.

County to hold a lottery for 390 taxicab licenses. Why should government be permitted to restrict free enterprise to this extent? Authorities might have a role in making sure for the sake of public safety that drivers are sufficiently trained and vehicles adequately maintained. However, it is not the place of government to determine or protect profits of an economic system characterized by considerable liberty.

County to hold a lottery for 390 taxicab licenses. Why should government be permitted to restrict free enterprise to this extent? Authorities might have a role in making sure for the sake of public safety that drivers are sufficiently trained and vehicles adequately maintained. However, it is not the place of government to determine or protect profits of an economic system characterized by considerable liberty.

The grandson of a deceased medal of honor winner was denied entry to the West Wing of the White House despite being invited because casual dress is not permitted there. I guess Bill was in his formal wear when he slipped it to Monica. The office can't be any more defaced by a tike in a t-shirt with his grandfather's picture on it than it already has been by a number of its contemporary occupiers.

Obama Picked On Camera Dupes Based On Appearance

One must also ask, and what if these people refused and more importantly what kinds of security restrictions were imposed upon the neighbors?

Pentagon Brownie Recipe Exceeds 25 pages

Obama To Compile Eco-Tyranny Slowly

Death Threats Issued Over Tea Party Coloring Book

A typical response on the part of the advocates of civility and inclusiveness

Hispanicists Electorally Threaten Republicans Refusing To Surrender The United States

Il Duce Denounces Fox News As Subversive

Military Undermines Second Amendment Rights

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Cowering Whites Keep Sharpton In Power

Pictured on the cover of the 8/12/10 issue of Newsweek Magazine is a portrait of Al Sharpton.

To the left of the infamous rabble rouser's visage, the title reads, "The Reinvention Of Reverend Al: From Tawana To Obama (What Sharpton's Longevity Says About Race In America)."

What it says is that White Americans have been so beaten over the head with the threat of being labeled "racist" that most are too afraid to expose this huckster for what he is.

At best, Sharpton should only be brought out occasionally as a semi-entertaining buffoon to serve as a foil on media interview programs rather than as any serious kind of policy visionary.

Was Dead Restauranter Dipping His Finger In His Pastry Chef

So in Utah, do you face a possible five year prison term if you get caught cheating on your wife and she doesn't know about it, or does the sentence only apply to those who have their wife's blessing?

The Senate intends to bestow upon the late Robert Byrd's family compensation equal to a year's salary. If you croke before the end of the month, your family is expected to return the Social Security check.

Utah police are investigating the stars of a reality series glamorizing polygamy over allegations of bigamy. If the queers, the shacked up, and chronic fornicators are going to insist that what we do in our bedrooms is our own business and in terms of legal benefits there is only one valid marriage among this group, on what grounds does the state turn around and prosecute consenting adults?

Stephen King Sinks Fangs Into Vampire Bandwagon

Mandatory Sex Vaccine Kills Unsuspecting Teens

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Leftists Call For Riot In Washington

Billed as a rally, it is a safe wager there will be more arrests and destruction of property than at any Tea Party. Should make for interesting CSPAN viewing. Won't be able to see as many freaks gathered in one place until January's American Idol auditions.

Obama Propaganda Effort To Violate Property Rights

Don't think so? Ask the neighbors of these dupes if they were allowed out in their yards and such while the New Lord descended upon these patches of earth.

Obama Supporters Embrace Ahmadinejad

Americans Wallow In Religious Ignorance

Just as much blame needs to be placed on the nation's churches for teaching all this COMMUNITY, COMMUNITY, COMMUNITY garbage these days instead of actual religious and theological doctrine.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

School Girl Sentenced To Multiday Detention For Possessing Jolly Rancher

The girl was told to write an essay as to why what she did was wrong.  What if she did not see the act as inherently wrong?

Parking Tickets Laced With Yoga Propaganda

One might assume that Jennifer Lopez is the replacement judge for Paula Abdul on American Idol. Such a judgement might be mistaken. Given his level of drug useage, it might actually be Steven Tyler filling the role once held by Paula.

General Orders The Ranks To Embrace Sodomites

The women exhausted from defending Obama has gotten what she deserves. The thing is though, she and her ilk have dragged a significant percentage down with them.

Is The Equinox A Scientific Fraud?

Jimmy Carter Shoves His Nose Up His Own Rearend

At the Institute On The Constitution's October 1st Friday event discussing the qualificiations for holding government office, the organization should clarify statements made by one of its spokesman about putting to death leaders of non-Calvinistic sects referred to as "false prophets" & what political rights/opportunities they think ought to be denied women & others not belonging to recognized Calvinistic churches.

Father Charged With Disorderly Conduct For Confronting Bullies

And will the adolescent pissants be charged with anything as well? Will probably end up getting a fat welfare check instead.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Eleanor Homes Norton Caught Requesting Donation Of Questionable Repute

Dawkins & Hitchens Call For The Pope's Arrest

Van Jones Bent On Destroying Fox News

Teen Invokes First Amendment To Justify Looking Like A Heathen

Guess DC mayoral candidate Vincent Gray's vision of "One City" doesn't include much of a role for White folks since these were made the scapegoat and villian of his campaign.

Police Stand By As Family Raped, Murdered, Set On Fire

Likely stuffing their faces with doughuts. Bet if the father had blown off the heads of these scumbag criminals, the police would have gone in to arrest the man defending his family.

In coverage of a lunatic possessing body armor believed to be a threat to the President, it was remarked one should not be allowed to threaten the President. And that is absolutely correct. But shouldn’t it be as much a crime to threaten all of America as a whole? As such, the Ground Zero Imam should be taken into custody as well.

A kook suspected of threatening the President is being charged in part with illegally possessing body armor. So basically, the police are allowed to protect themselves from homicidal miscreants but we as citizens are not allowed to protect ourselves from homicidal miscreants which easily include errant police. Since no one is harmed if an individual owns a bullet proof vest since the vest alone cannot be used as an implement of violence, a free citizen would be allowed to own a bullet proof vest.

Salvatore Giunta is the first living recipient of the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War. Wonder how many other soldiers named John Smith have acted as valiantly but whose names were not alluringly exotic enough to merit such public accolades.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

At Least Marie Antoinette Would Let Us Have Cake

During his campaign for the presidency, Barack Obama lamented the tendency of Americans to eat what we want, drive SUV's, and keep our homes climate controlled at 70 degrees. Some will observe that I have already published a number of columns regarding the aforementioned sentiment. And I will continue to do so for as long as the Obama's hypocritically admonish to the minutest detail how we are to live lives of sacrificial austerity for the sake of the COMMUNITY while they themselves wallow in opulent luxury.

According to NBCBayArea.com, the President attended a fundraiser in California primarily for the benefit of Senator Barbara Boxer. Despite likely expending more in fossil fuels to reach his destination than the average suburbanite does puttering around town in a Ford Explorer or Jeep Cherokee, the opulence did not stop there.

When most regular Americans have a get together, they usually have cheese whiz and maybe Dominoes Pizza if they really feel like splurging. Such provisions, however, aren't quite good enough for those that not only think they are better than the rest of us but that it is their place to run our own lives as well.

According to SFGate.com, those paying over $17,000 per person to attend the fundraiser held at the Getty Mansion ingested quail eggs and caviar, salmon, avocado on tortilla chips, and Kobe beef short ribs with potatoes. For desert, those gathered had buckwheat crepes with roasted cherries and almond ice cream. If one is what one eats, wouldn't that now make Obama "buckwheat" with one granted linguistic amnesty from being denounced as racist since one would simply be making a dietary observation.

As the type that expect to be praised and heralded for all that they do, the Obamas's didn't start a vegetable garden at the White House as a way to relax by poking around in the dirt at the end of the day. Rather, to the First Lady especially, the very bounty of the Good Lord's earth is to be co-opted for the purposes of scolding the American people as to our ways deemed errant in the eyes of contemporary world Bolshevism.

One of the obvious reasons behind the garden is to rub the noses of the American parents in the nutritional insufficiencies of what they decide to feed their children. For example, should the social conditioning proposed by Frau Obama fully take hold, feeding your kids short ribs and ice cream all in the same meal will probably be grounds for a visit from social services should the neighbors catch wind of it.

The symbolism of the White House garden, however, goes beyond the centrality of nutrition to healthy living. The Obamas not only want to tell us what to eat but also from where to eat.

Catching on among those ashamed for enjoying a standard of living above that of Third World squalor are the Slow Food and Locally Grown Food movements. According to the advocates of these positions, the elites should admonish we lowly masses to only consume non-processed victuals grown in our respective areas. Most conveniently fail to mention that, if this mindset replaced current food production practices, Americans would be chained to their kitchens (or wherever else these fanatics allow us to prepare our sustenance) and more importantly, what is to prevent widespread starvation in areas where not much grows in the winter.

But so long as the likes of the Obamas have full bellies, it really doesn't matter what kind of gastronomical hardship their policy idiosyncrasies might impose upon the American people. It is the assumption, after all, among the circle Obama is most comfortable with that the population needs to be reduced anyway.

It has been argued that an army travels on its stomach. Other than the relationships with God and family, none are as profound as one's relationship with food.

A leader's attitude towards basic sustenance will reveal a great deal about his underlying political philosophy. Unfortunately, it seems Obama believes he is to be denied no culinary delight while you as a mere commoner are to endure happily a life of dietary aestheticism.

by Frederick Meekins

For supposedly being among the toughest people to walk the earth, the NFL certainly gets its collective athletic supporter in a jumble in regards to every politically correct cause that comes down the pike.

In his Sept 11th remarks, Obama insisted Americans need to "give back to their COMMUNITIES". You'll be doing plenty of that in more ways than you realize come January when tax rates are expected to rise.

Unstoppable Germ Traced To Third World Squalor

Find it interesting that Albert Mohler blamed men that the majority of those graduating with doctorates are now women. Perhaps most men realize what a crock and waste of time higher education happens to be. Are these women pursuing degrees in legitmate academic subjects such as the hard sciences and traditional versions of history or in things such as queer theory?

Oprah Whips Snooty White Liberals Into A Ghetto Frenzy

Government Deploys X-Ray Vans To Spy On Motorists

The stated purpose is to find contraband such as weapons, narcotics, and human smuggling. But given the Obama's propensity to control every aspect of your existence, what is to prevent them from determinging what kinds of foods you are purchasing at the supermarket?

According to the 9/14/10 edition of USA Today, Colorado provides a free school breakfast for all students. From the text & photo, it seems this meal consists primarily of a carton of milk & a prepackaged serving of cereal. If parents can't afford this at home, THEY OUGHT TO KEEP THEIR PANTS ON & REFRAIN FROM PROCREATNG!!!

Ground Zero Imam Threatens Terrorism If He Doesn't Get His Way

Dodgers Hire Russian Worlock

Monday, September 13, 2010

Time magazine's 2010 annual national service issue insists to "Teach Is To Serve". So if government teachers can get paid upwards around $45,000 to $50,000 and still be considered to be engaged in public service, why should the rest of us be continually hounded about "giving back to the COMMUNITY" for free when the occupations we are engaged in are as every much a social and economic necessity as the teaching profession.

Obama To Celebrate The Demise Of The White Race Twice In One Week

Peruvian chicken dealer on the radio promises an authentic dining experience. Does that include the cramps, sweats, and runs also?

First Nag Demands More Apples & Less Butter

This from someone that has barely ever cooked; she lives with her mother and had chefs on staff even when she was a nobody like everyone else.

Frankly, if one goes out to eat, one is going out for the slop. One can eat healthy at home.

Ground Zero Imam An Accused Slumlord

If one is "a person through other people", what is to keep them from denying you this conceptual status if it is bestowed by the group rather than something innate to you as a being created in God's image?

Those that go around burning books or flags at mass rallies have too much time on their hands. A sizeable percentage of these probably live on some kind of welfare --- be it government (Food Stamps or foreign aide) or ecclesiastical (handouts collected from threatening congregations how they will incur God’s wrath if they don’t pony up into the collection plate).

Cops should have probably shot the owner along with or rather instead of the dog at the DC street festival. As with people that drag newborns out into extreme cold or heat, often those that have to drag their dogs to mass gatherings unless they are seeing-eye type dogs merely want attention for themselves and don't really care about their animals.

Pentagon Develops Brainwashing Machine

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Christian Reconstructionist Inconsistent Regarding Chuck Baldwin

A fruitcake Christian Reconstructionist has condemned Chuck Baldwin's decision to retire from his Florida pastorate in order to move to Montana to start a new ministry focused on preserving what freedom remains.

The criticizer, who among other things believes Glenn Beck should be executed as a false prophet, contends that one cannot fight for freedom.

Hypocritically, the hyperpuritan making this claim himself works for an organization that purports to stand for the Constitution.

If we are to carry this analogy to its conclusion that one cannot fight for freedom, isn't that akin to saying it's sinful to go to work as that would be a sign of not relying on God to provide for your daily needs?

Thursday, September 09, 2010

U.S. Milirary Burns Bibles In Afghanistan

McLaren Embraces Universalism

The Pastor of the The Dove Christian World Outreach might actually make a good Muslim. Of those studying (or rather brainwashed) under his tutelage, he dictates how much and where they can eat (sort of like Michelle Obama), how they may interact with members of the opposite sex, and even the kinds and extent of contact they may have with their families.

If deadbeat mobs in the trashpile nations of the earth have the time to rampage over the actions of a single pastor of a small church, they obviously aren't anywhere near starvation so we should cut out the foreign aide.

Ground Zero Imam Threatens Violence If Heathen Structure Moved

Eco Police To Sniff Around In Your Garbage

This Obama financed civilian security force intends to use computer technology to make sure you are recycling and compel you to undergo reeducation if you do not comply.

School Cafeteria Compiling Dietary Dossiers On Students

Questions regarding the Koran immolation. If the cult purchased the texts they plan to destory, isn't that supporting Islam with the pocket book? And are the Korans in question Arabic or English translations. If English, the fanatics most likely to fly into a rampage don't even view these texts as actual Korans.

Since the handbook of the Dove World Outreach ministerial training academy is blatantly cultic, perhaps there could be a counter protest where the advocates of religious liberty burn copies of that document instead.

Koran-Burning Church Run Like Cult

America has a thriving pork industry. Should we also give that up if it ticks off the Muslims?

Audio: Rationalism & Fideism

Audio: Rationalism & Fideism
- Watch more Videos at Vodpod.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

In for a penny, in for a pound. Burning the Koran is not the smartest move apologetically. However, if the Florida church backs down now, Islamists will view Americans as weak and will up their demands. Will it get to the point where American military leaders and the likes of Sean Hannity will insist that Christians be castigated for holding to the divinity and exclusivity of Christ?

Interesting those concerned about the questionable background of the Koran burning pastor don't get all that worked up over the terrorist links of the ground zero imam.

Jungle Bunnies Bump & Grind At White House

It might be justice to lock the horse butcherers, who started taking the meat off another person's horse before the creature even died, in a very small pen with an extremely irritated and territorial horse.

Establishmentarian Media Debates Whether To Side With The Truth Or Propaganda About The War Continuing In Iraq

Will Immigrant Horse Butcherers Get Light Sentence?

Guess we will be told to respect their "cultural" practice of removing the meat before the horse has even died and that, as rich White people, the owners deserve this kind of heartache and should be thankful for the opportunity to contribute to the sustenance of minority COMMUNITIES.

Apostates Announce Solidarity With Islam

Hartford, Conn Surrenders To Islam

Mafia Benefits From Windenergy Handouts

World Famine Looms

Billy Ray Cyrus & Heathen-Looking Son To Become Reality TV UFO Investigators

Congressional Democrats Plot To Herd The Masses Into Glorified Concentration Camps

Expensive environmental upgrades will force property owners to give up their homes or face financial ruin.

The Obama administration and liberal media are the ones seeking violence in the afterglow of the Koran pyre. Otherwise, who would know what an otherwise miniscule congregation would be up to. Probably more end up dead in an average Islamic riot than attend the enitre church.

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

Regarding the threat by the church playing with less than a full deck to burn Korans: in America at least you are free to have as many Korans as you want for any purpose. In lands where Islamists rule, it is against the law to own a Bible and a capital offense to eventually be persuaded as to the veracity of that particular text.

Americans Murdered In Iraq Despite Ballyhooed End Of The War

Al Gore School Environmentally Toxic

Did Wikileaker Consider Sex Change?

The Kennedy Center's celebration of Mexico commences on September 11th. Will Al Sharpton organize a protest of this event for taking attention away from the higher purpose of this solemn day?

Jesse Jackson's Gas Guzzler Carjacked At Environmentalist Rally

President Obama is complaining that his critics talk about him like a dog. Well, his wife is a real b----.

If General Petraeus is now handing down edicts as to what kind of expression is going to set off radical Islamists in regards to the plans to burn Koran's by one church, is he also going to hand down similar opinions regarding sodomite nuptuals and tramps sauntering about with 3/4's of their jiggly bosoms exposed for all to see?

Thursday, September 02, 2010

Those touting Zipcars as an alternative to automobile ownership should stop and think seriously for a moment. This concept is gaining in popularity on college campuses. As such, are these cars thoroughly screened and cleaned between renters. If not, when you are pulled over by police, are you willing to go down on a drug charge for the last person that borrowed the car and forgot to take their pot with them when they parked it?

John Lofton has threatened to "report me" if I dare post anything on his facebook wall. Guess he doesn't like me questioning his desire to see Glenn Beck executed as a false prophet. People need to wake up not only to the vipers outside of Evangelical Christianity but as well as the snakes they have let inside the tent as well.

Vitamin Water recruits Gary Busey as spokesman. Not exactly the comeplling embodiment of physical vigor and mental vitality you'd want associated with a healthfood product.

If John Lofton believes that every last stipulation of the Old Testament law must be implemented literally without being tempered by God's grace, the food at the Institute on the Constitution picnic must be kosher.

Movie Depicting Gringo-Killing Hispanosupremacist Applauded As Hilarious

Obama Blows Up Another Oil Rig

Youth Groups Wallowing In Regurgitation, Feel Up & Homoerotic Activities

The Discovery Channel building hijacker wanted a stop put to the birth of parasitic human beings. How is he any worse than the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger? She played a role in the death of millions of human beings while this fruitcake didn't kill a single person.

Taser-Happy Cops Zap Cardiac Patient

Cops tell man to stand up and then shock him for compliance. To show how brainless many police are, the nervous system runs on electrical impulses and then law enforcement act all surprised when someone is convulsing on the floor as if they have control over their reaction. Police like these are one reason why the Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment

Burro orifice John Lofton forbids me from posting on his profile asking him to clarify his position on wanting to execute those he disagrees with such as Glenn Beck. Given that the show he hosts for his employers at the Institute on the Constitution, the American View, sounds similar to some of my websites The American Worldview which the IOTC use to link to years ago, you'd think I'd deserve a bit more respect.

The Discovery Channel building hijacker wanted a stop put to the birth of parasitic human beings. How is he any worse than the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger? She played a role in the death of millions of human beings while this fruitcake didn't kill a single person.

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Ecoterrorist takes Discovery Channel Building hostage. Are we now going to blame Whale Wars in much the same way we blame talk radio for every gunnut that goes off his rocker?

Did Prince Phillip Have Lady Di Murdered For Refusing To Bed Him?

But perhaps an even more shocking headline is that apparently there was someone she wouldn't sleep with.

Islamists Launch Propaganda Campaign

Ought one be careful about calling for the execution of false prophets? Because no doubt in someone else's theology, those calling for the death penalty against false prophets could very well be considered false prophets.

If one of the organization’s primary spokesman thinks that Glenn Beck and Harold Camping should be executed, should average Conservatives and Christians feel at ease at a meeting of the Institute on The Constitution? For if one of the meeting’s organizers had his way, he would just as likely burn you at the stake. At the groups upcoming barbecue, just stop and think that it might very well one day be you turning on the rotisserie.

Should Mike Peroutka be asked his opinion on one of his key staff members hinting that Glenn Beck should be executed?

Contrary to a commenter of one of my columns posted at Redstate.com, my purpose as a commentator is not “to get conservative Republicans elected to office. To paraphrase the Bard,. “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in you electoral system.” Politicians are to serve us and not we them. Anyone that believes that thought and expression should be curtailed to serve the alleged needs of establishmentarian Republicans are as much enemies of human liberty as any Democrat.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Red China Turns U.S. Human Rights Molehills Into Mountains

The United States and China discussed human rights at a round of high-level talks. One might be surprised that the meeting did not so much focus on the egregious atrocities that have gone on under this Communist tyranny from the time of its founding to this very day. Rather, Obama administration officials allowed America to be berated on issues such as homelessness and the new Arizona immigration law.

Before America as a nation takes this criticism seriously, perhaps we should consider what the law entails and how this compares with what goes on in Red China.

The Arizona law will permit police to ascertain an individual's identity and thus legality after initial contact. Essentially, this isn’t anything that isn’t already authorized by law and is perhaps an even better guarantor of individual liberty and dignity than what is already permitted.

In a number of decisions, the Supreme Court ruled that police could compel an individual to identify themselves even when it had not been established that the law had even been violated or that there was probable cause indicating such. Interestingly, there were no riotous mobs in the streets when it was thought these kinds of identity checks were only going to be aimed at actual Americans.

Even if scores of those with no legal standing in the United States are removed from the streets of Arizona as a result of the new law, they will still fair considerably better than those taken into custody in dictatorships. In Iran, several American coed tourists straying over the Islamic Republic’s border with Iraq were sentenced to lengthy prison terms.

And unlike illegals here, those there are not fawned over with lavish government handouts with their bureaucratic benefactors hoping the outsiders will recast the entire society in a foreign image.

It could be properly argued that the American students deserved some kind of punishment for violating another country’s sovereign borders. What likely cannot be argued against is that the accommodations they languished in made Camp Gitmo look like a swanky New York City hotel. Guards there are not going out of their way to provide American delicacies or to treat our holy books and founding documents with a nauseating degree of deference.

In China, one house church pastor sentenced to prison was allowed to languish and suffer without access to his diabetic medicine. And it could be argued that he can be considered one of the lucky ones. It has been claimed that organs are regularly harvested from dissident Tibetans and Christians.

If Red China had the illegal alien problem plaguing the United States, do you honestly believe authorities there would do little than look over the papers of these transnational vagrants, whisper sweet nothings in their ears, and release them on their recognizance which many have very little of to begin with given their connections to the drug trade, human smuggling, and assorted gangs. And given the propensity of a certain atrocity to occur throughout Chinese history (be it during the Great Cultural Revolution or in rumors a few years back regarding what was being done to fetuses), if a wife in China told her husband that they would be having a little Mexican later that evening that wouldn't mean he should expect to have a taco or burrito for dinner.

Many infringements upon human rights stem from an improper understanding of the relationship between social institutions such as government and the individual. In America, the extremes of these have been minimized in part due to the assumption that the individual possesses worth of his own created in the image of God. The individual is not owned by the state.

As an officially atheistic socialist country, the Chinese Communist Party and state see themselves as the highest authority with these determining that it is not so much the individual that counts but rather the group as a whole. After all, if we are simply nothing more than animated primordial ooze as the Darwinian insists and upon which Marxist-Leninism rests, it is kind of hard to get worked up over one person when there are over a billion more walking around easily capable of taking the place of a defective cog in the machine of state.

Since in the Communist system you are less an individual, the more the system provides of those things deemed to be necessities by the overseers (under whom fewer things end up being defined as necessities than in a free market economy) in such command societies such commodities extended only so that the goals mapped out for you by the COMMUNITY might be achieved. In a constitutional republican system, it is believed that the individual is best suited to determine for themselves which needs and desires should take priority for oneself and one's family. Granted, the system is not perfect, but it is far preferable and more in line with what God intended for humanity.

Thus, that is no doubt why China would rank homelessness as a human rights violation while not batting an eye at putting a bullet in the back of the head of a House Church pastor so that his kidneys might remain undamaged for organ harvesting. In America, those who love liberty must first inquire as to why the individual is homeless before formulating an appropriate policy response.

Though it is not politically correct to mention it these days and even if they represent only a fraction of those without a domicile, frankly there are those that simply refuse to do that which is necessary to maintain a residence or they engage in behaviors that cause their homes to be lost. Of those that went into vapors when Glenn Beck critiqued the subject, tell me where is the social justice to take from those working and scrimping in order to hoe their own path to give it to those living irresponsibly and demanding a standard of living far above a subsistence level with a few basic comforts that they are not willing to exert the labor necessary to acquire?

One might feel sorry for the children of such deadbeats and somehow provide enough for the children to get by without hardly a single bread crumb going to such pathetic excuses for parents. It is preferable that such outreach come from the private sector free to point out the deficiencies of individual character and the blunt steps necessary to correct the situation. Often in these times where we must constantly walk around on eggshells for fear of offending some self-enlightened leftist do-gooder with a law degree or a bullhorn and definitely too much time on their hands, government is unable to articulate those steps necessary for complete restoration.

And while we are at it, perhaps something needs to be said about and to these women that fall for scumbag men. If you find the boozing and carousing attractive when you are young only to have it morph into not knowing how you are going to feed the five kids because he's blowing the milk money on beer and backhanded you across the face because you dared ask where he was the night before, other than for tossing his rear in jail, don't expect much pity and especially don't expect some behaved guy you wouldn't give the time of day to 15 years ago to take you in as if he has some obligation to provide for another man's progeny.

One of contemporary liberalism's most glaring intellectual deficiencies is that it assumes that the remainder of the world, when you come down to it, lives no differently than the people of the United States. Before we pull out the sackcloth and ashes to belittle ourselves embarrassingly on the world stage, let’s at least make sure we don’t waste the effort on autocrats, thieves, cutthroats, and homicidal mass murderers.

by Frederick Meekins

Veteran Facilities Permitted To Crumble While Millions Dished Out To Foreign Mosques

What is Planned For The Ground Zero Mosque Mystery Floors

According to this story, the ground zero mosque contains a number of "mystery floors" where it has not been explained what will be going on. Usually in embassies, these unlisted floors are where the intelligence service operations (spying, sabotage) are planned and carried out.

If Obama thinks it is a bother to have his "birth certificate plastered to his forehead", then why isn't it a burder for businesses now to file a notification with the IRS for every purchase over several hundred dollars?

Thespian Calls For The Ritual Murder Of Newt Gingrich & Fox News

Will Glenn Beck Dupe Americans Into Accepting Mormonism?

Once the idealism of the Beck rally settles, how will the Tea Party and affiliated movements react to clergy not hopping onboard the universalist version of Glen Beck's interpretation of the Black Regiment?

Monday, August 30, 2010

Aspiring Lackeys Now Pay For The Privilege To Do Jobs No One Else Will

Parents Letting 13 Year Olds Race Motorcylces Are Downright Negligent

If parents can end up having social servies step in these days for refusing to let their children attend school dances, making them attend church, or for keeping tabs over what they read, perhaps it ought to be considered when they allow their progeny operate a vehicile that they could not do so legally on the street for several more years.

Beck Bends Knee To Chairman Obama

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Lessons In Apologetics #4: Pragmaticism & Combinationalism

The next theory of truth and religious knowledge is pragmatism. Developed initially by Charles Sander Pierce and expanded by William James, pragmatism is the theory that truth is not determined by what one thinks, feels, or discovers but rather by what works.

Christians may instinctively recoil from this initially. However, the proper response to this epistemological methodology needs to be more nuanced than the believer might originally suspect.

Providing in part an alternative to the early 20th century viewpoint promoted in large part by Sigmund Freud that belief in God was psychologically harmful, in works such as "The Varieties Of Religious Experience", James believed religion should be judged by its results in the life of the individual. Overall, James concluded that, "In a general way...on the whole...our testing of religion by practical common sense and the empirical method leaves it in possession of its towering place in history. For economically, the saintly group of qualities is indispensable to the world’s welfare (109).”

However, any alliance the Christian apologist may make with William James is tenuous at best. For example, James categorized the pantheistic outlook of Mediterranean paganism as healthy and those emphasizing the need to be “twice born” as epitomizing a Germanic dourness characterized by an obsession regarding man’s fallen nature and need to be saved by God (105).

Though few in number, Christian apologists have adapted pragmaticism to the defense of the faith. Foremost among these is Francis Schaeffer.

Schaeffer’s method might not be considered solely pragmatic by the methodology’s purists as he does not allow a worldview’s viability to determine whether or not it is true but rather to show how the Christian worldview is the most consistently livable. Schaeffer refers to this test as an experiential teleological argument (110).

In a Schaefferian apologetic, one takes the propositions of a particular worldview and projects them onto the movie screen of life. For example, Schaeffer noted how the materialism of Jackson Pollock drove the artist to suicide and how musician John Cage did not adhere to the philosophy of chance that categorized his music when it came to picking potentially deadly mushrooms

The next epistemological methodology is combinationalism. Throughout this discourse thus far, it has been observed that, while each methodology contributes something to our understanding of God and knowledge, none of these approaches is sufficient enough to stand alone as the only way through which to obtain an understanding of reality. But instead of falling into a state of solipsistic dismay that nothing can be known since each approach falls short, combinationalists suggest that the insights of each method ought to be knit together in order to produce the most comprehensive understanding possible.

One such apologist utilizing this approach is Edward J. Carnell. Carnell combines rationalism, which he defines as a “horizontal self-consistency so that all of the major assumptions of the position can be so related together that they placate the rules of formal logic” and evidentialism, which he categorizes as “a vertical fitting of the facts” in that one’s assumptions must cohere with the “real concrete facts of human history (122).” Together, these elements make up systematic consistency.

However, even combinationalists must proceed with caution. As Geisler points out in “the leaky bucket argument”, if the other methodologies are insufficient on their own, these do not necessarily hold the epistemological water any better when they are combined together (129). Furthermore, often when one proceeds to evaluate a worldview, it can be very easy to fall into the trap of presupposing the worldview before it has been established or the facts are spun in such a way to fit into the worldview.

For example, Geisler uses the example of Christ's Resurrection. Geisler writes, "An apologist...cannot legitimately appeal to the miracle of Christ's resurrection as a proof for the existence of God (129)." This statement, shocking on its face value, means that God is already presupposed if the event is categorized as miraculous in terms of its explanation. Geisler reassures, "On the other hand, grant that God already exists, then the resurrection may very well be a miraculous way of confirming that Jesus of Nazareth is the Son of God (129)."

Source:
Geisler, Norman. "Christian Apologetics". Baker Academic, 1988.

By Frederick Meekins

If Nancy Pelosi thinks everybody has the right to express their religious beliefs on their own property, is she going to come out as enthusiastically in support of St. Nicholas Orthodox Church as she has the Ground Zero mosque?

If Nancy Pelosi thinks everybody has the right to express their religious beliefs on their own property, is she going to come out as enthusiastically in support of St. Nicholas Orthodox Church as she has the Ground Zero mosque?

Eyescanners To Turn World Cities Into Virtual Police States

Pentagon Castigated For Noticing Chinese Military Expansion

Billionaires Minding Their Own Business Shouldn't Have To Explain Why They Haven't Taken The Oath To Give Away 1/2 Their Fortunes

Only those that drone on about giving back to the COMMUNITY or how we mere commoners have too much should have this matter rubbed in their faces.

Establishmentarian Headshrinkers Denounce Superheroes As Sarcastic & Insufficiently Communal

Mind-controlling Parasites

If no independent photojournalists were permitted to accompany him, how can it be verified that those were Gulf waters that President Obama was frolicking in?

Farah & Coulter Spat Over Homocon

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

U.S. Government Financing Mosque Repair & Upkeep

Welfare Deadbeats Rampage

Just see what the TSA would do to you if you grabbed two beers and deployed the escape chute no matter how justifed your actions were.

Apparently Jennifer Anniston Comprehends Neither Biology Nor Social Sciences

The actress claimed that women no longer have to "fiddle with a man" in order to have a child.

If there is no "fiddling" involved, from where are the necessary gametes acquired?

More importantly, if women don't need any assistance from men in raising children, don't let them look towards a fat uncle named Sam either in terms of handouts nor to strongarm the deadbeats fathering these youngsters.

Seems Elton John is as prominently featured as the bride along with Rush Limbaugh's wedding pictures posted on Facebook.

If passengers have to remain quiet & pliant at the hands of abusive airline staff & security out of fear of terrorism charges, shouldn't airline staff also have to take the beration from irrate passengers as well?

UN Attempts To Seize Control Of Public School System

Audio: Olympics Subtly Lure Tots Into Paganism's Embrace

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Liberals are having the vapors that Fox News has an insufficient number of African American viewers. Are these multiculturalists also going to toss a hissy over the very name of Black Entertainment television alienating Whites? Instead of blaming Fox News for not appealing to Blacks, maybe Blacks should be chastised for not liking Fox News as such is likely an indication of preferring a life of indolence and government dependence.

Judge Rules Muslims Permitted To Beat Women

Sodomite Matrimony Penetrates Deeper Into Conservative Movement

Obama's Expect You To Toss Your Elderly Into The Garbage While They Mourn Their's With Lavish Iberian Vacations

Palin Is Correct: Some Teachers Need An Eyerolling

Contrary to leftist press, teachers deserve no more adoration than any other profession and, in the case of the public school system, have been at the forefront of collapsing the republic.

State Department Finances Muslim Missionary Trips

Haggard Insists Gay Marriage No Different Than Being Overweight Or Taking An Aspirin

Hispanosupremacists Denounce Deportations

Will Oil Contaminate Food Supply?

Anne Rice Renounces Christianity

Aren't the competing worldviews she claims are given the shaft by Christians actually bigger burs in the world's backside than organized Christendom?

Government Forbids Collecting Rainwater Falling On Your Property

Won't be long until they claim the fruits of your vegetable garden and supplies in your food pantry as well as a COMMUNITY resource.

Thursday, August 05, 2010

Bloomberg says it's not place of government to vet clergy and everyone is entitled to their opinion. Thus, would he welcome Pat Buchanan or David Duke establishing offices in NYC?

Parents Lose Custody Of Tot Named Hitler

The justification is domestic violence.  Guess if you snatched all the kids named Muhammad where wife beatings took place, you'd not have enough orphanges to house all the foundlings.

Crazed Chinamen Continue Pupil Slaying Rampages

Neither secular statists nor religious theocrats can blame this one on too much freedom.

Did a carnival game where players could shoot foam darts at a figure resembling Obama get the attention of authorities for threatening the President or for insinuating the influence non-terrestrial intelligences might have over government and policy?

Will Positive Thinking Hokem Get Tony Robbins Back On The Air?

NYC Christ-Despisers Rush To Build Mosque But Drag Feet Regarding Church

Wonder if that booze Obama swills, the cigs he puffs, and the cocaine he use to snort were all locally grown.

Candidate Exposes Globalist Efforts To Use Environemtnalism To Destroy Liberty

If Government Videotapes Citizens, Citizens Should Videotape Government

So ashamed of me in the virtual world that you deny knowing of me, perhaps you should consider doing the same in the actual one."

Monday, August 02, 2010

Bitch At Communion: But Is It The Dog Or The Priest?

Hispanic Impregnates 13 Year Old

Multiculturalism for you.

The girl's parents are probably as much human scum as her violator and probably barely speak audible English.

Guess there are some that would claim this filth shouldn't have to show police their ID's or immigration papers.

Let's hear what the immigration status of all parties involved just happens to be.

Obama's Mama's Passport Records Conveniently Destroyed

A theonomical Christian Reconstructionist has theorized that the only valid marriages are between Christians. Unless this statement is clarified, this means that the children born to non-Christians would be illegitimate bastards & that should Reconstructionists come to power, they would deny basic civil and contractual rights to those not members of their Calvinistic churches.

Sunday, August 01, 2010

Lessons In Apologetics #3: Experientialism & Evidentialism

The next methodology is experientialism. Though fideism strives to make faith alone the justification for religious knowledge or belief, Geisler observes that this faith is ultimately justified in terms of an experience had by the individual (65).

To the experientialist, God or the Ultimate is not so much something to be understood or comprehended but rather felt. Stretching all the way back to the Neoplatonist Plotinus, experientialism views what the believer refers to as God as "the one beyond all knowing and being (66)."

In fact, God is so far beyond what the finite mind is capable of comprehending that to really say anything about God is highly inaccurate as to do so would be limiting God. As such, the best the individual can aspire to is an intuitive mystical union with the universal by turning inward through an ascetic detachment from the physical world around us in pursuit of a metaphysical unity.

Friedrich Schleiermacher provided for a more accessible apprehension of the cosmic or divine by equating religious experience not so much with monastic solitude but rather with the feeling of absolute dependence we all feel from time to time. According to Schleiermacher, this feeling is actually the World Spirit reaching out to us and actualizing within each of us.

To experientialists, dogmas and doctrines are not that important (that itself actually a doctrine though) as these conceptual formulations are merely shadows or echoes of the deeper experience. While experientialists are correct that the individual must have some kind of encounter with God beyond that often referred to as "book knowledge", one begins to trod upon dangerous ground when the experience becomes the ultimate criteria for judgment by positing that those having more intense experiences are somehow more in touch with the cosmos as in the case of certain meditation cults.

If experience itself is made the highest standard, the individual will end up not knowing whether or not he is being led into deception. I John 4:1 tells us to test the spirits to see if they are from God.

The next apologetic methodology is evidentialism. Rationalism, fideism, and experientialism are largely inwardly focused approaches to knowledge of God with both fideism and experientialism also being highly subjective as well. Evidentialism tends to be more objective as it points to evidence existing independently of an individual's internal emotional or intellectual states to make a case for the existence of God.

While experientialism stresses the importance of a personal acquaintance with what we categorize as the divine, evidentialism provides an anchor to prevent such hypothesizing from meandering off into exceedingly esoteric or individualized speculation by providing a basis for belief any interested party is free to investigate at their own leisure. The primary forms of proof offered by evidentialists are nature and history.

Nature is probably the form of evidence best used when the individual being appealed to is not yet even a theist. This proof for the existence of God is known as the teleological argument in that it holds that the intricate structures found in the world point to the need for a designer.

This idea is expressed in terms of the Watchmaker Hypothesis formulated by William Paley. Paley contended that, if one found a watch in the woods, one would from the intricacies of its parts working together in tandem for a purpose assume the contraption would need a designer. Likewise, since the world is no less complex and actually even more so, it is only logical to conclude that the physical universe around us would also require a designer.

Having lived from 1743-1805, Paley himself did not face the Darwinian onslaught. However, others since then have tweaked the argument to make it stronger against criticisms such as those of John Stuart Mill. Mill argued that the watchmaker analogy was weak because we know things like watches have watchmakers and, without a perspective beyond which a finite human being is capable, Hume's speculation of organicism with the world growing like a vegetable could very well be correct.

To counter the Darwinian and Humean notions that given enough time a number of elements could be reshuffled enough to fortuitously result in the world we see around us, A.E. Taylor and F.R. Tennat have argued that the world around us shows too much adaptation and anticipation to have been the product of random chance. For example, Taylor notes how the body’s need for oxygen is anticipated by biological structures such as membranes and organs. Geisler writes, “In fact, mind or intelligence is the only known condition that can overcome the improbabilities against the development and preservation of life...In short, the order evident in natural development of life is evidence of God (90)."

While this brand of evidentialism is vital in convincing the atheist or agnostic that God exists, it is not enough to bring someone to a saving knowledge of Christ as many of the world's religions such as Judaism, Islam, and even apostate forms of Christianity are full of theists barreling down the road to Hell. An evidentialist approach emphasizing history directly confronts the unbeliever with the decision he will have to make to decide his eternal destiny.

One of the aspects of Christianity that sets it apart from many of the other religions and belief systems is its historical nature in that the validity of its claims ultimately rest upon the veracity of actual events. II Peter 1:16 says, "For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty?"

Since these events took place within the flow of normal time, by utilizing research methods similar to those used to investigate the past such as the examination of ancient documents, one can construct an intellectual framework reasonably assuming that Christ did indeed exist. Prominent evidentialists utilizing history would include John Warwick Montgomery and Lee Strobel.

Despite the strength of evidentialist apologetics, its efforts to elevate religious dialogue beyond one's internal feelings (the burning in the bosom referred to by the Mormons which could very easily be indigestion), the approach is not without drawbacks. For while facts can indeed exist as objective realities, the individual can often go to great lengths to put a spin on them that fits them into an individual’s preconceived worldview.

For example, those inclined to marvel at the world around them can more easily be persuaded that everything was created by a wise and loving God than those who view the world through a survival of the fittest mindset focusing on the violence, bloodshed, and disease that often characterizes both the human and animal realms. Evidentialists will counter that often the theistic interpretation turns out to be the most credible rather than naturalistic ones that stretch plausibility such as the Apostles absconding with Christ’s body or Jesus being revived in the cool of the tomb.

Source:

Geisler, Norman. "Christian Apologetics". Baker Academic, 1988.

By Frederick Meekins

Three homicidal maniacs escaped from a prison in Arizona. If apprehended by police, would it be wrong for law enforcement personnel to ask to verify their ID's?

Friday, July 30, 2010

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Hispanosupremacists Rampage Despite Ruling In Their Favor

Jordan River Baptism Not Worth The Trouble

Obama labels Blacks a "mongrel people". Can you imagine the hell that would bust loose had Bush said such a thing? What makes Obama's statement any less offensive than something David Duke might have said in his robe wearing days?

If there are no possessions, religion, heaven, or hell as John Lennon's song "Imagine" insists, on what grounds does Yoko Ono oppose the parole of her husband's killer?

If Dispensationalism in a sinful heresy, shouldn't John Lofton condemn his employer Michael Peroutka for selecting Chuck Baldwin as his 2004 Vice Presidential running mate?

Apparently Neal Boortz Is A Sodomite Stooge

Is Staten Island Being Surrendered To Mexican Forces?

Shouldn't the blame for a 16 year old Dallas girl getting fangs put in be put on the parents and dentist rather than the author and producers of Twilight?

If illegal aliens can't be compelled to carry ID & prove who they are, isn't it a form of tyranny to require that of actual legitimate Americans?

Illegals Infiltrate Military Intelligence

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Honestly, I can barely tell the difference between Islamists and Christian Reconstructionists. Just saw a post by one hoping the entire East Coast of the United States be destroyed.

Arizona Surrendered To Hispanosupremacists

Fairy Demands Ferry Discount

Interesting how Calvinistic, theonomical Christian Reconstructionists will not directly answer the claim as to what they intend to do should they ever come to power with Christians that profess what this variety of theology would brand heresy.

Obama Does Little To Stop Honor Killings

Does the Institute On The Constution insist upon the death penalty for those holding to alternative interpretations of Christianity as advocated by one of its primary spokesman?

Christian Reconstructionism is a philsophy having so much in common with the Taliban that, in at least one instance I have seen, adherents of this outlook are starting to side with the Taliban against the United States.

LeAnn Rimes Shacks Up As Concubine

Political Theorist Proposes How To Handle The Zombie Menace

This may seem like a bizarre topic to address in one of the world's most prestigious foreign policy journals. However, what one may actually be witnessing here are plans gently being fleshed out on how to handle the hitherto unexperienced supernatural phenomena that will manifest itself during the Tribulation period.

Obama Minions Propose Involuntary Servitude

About the only thing worthy of applause regarding this bill is that it includes women as well as men.

For if the contemporary woman is not going to be a stay-at-home wife and mother, on what grounds should they be exempt from a life of service or even death on behalf of the state?

If every one is equal, your life is no more valuable than mine. If men can be compelled to sacrifice against their will, why not women?

A Nebraska town has delayed the implementation of a law that would forbid employers from hiring illegals or renting property to them. Interesting how the rest of us already have to submit everything just short of our latest colonoscopy to acquire employment or shelter.

Monday, July 26, 2010

A theonomical Christian Reconstructionist posits that blasphemy is promoting lies about God and that those promulgating such ideas should be given the death penalty. How long would such a policy be in place until it was extended to cover those promoting theologies radical Calvinists abhor such as Dispensationalism and Arminianism?

If the spokesman of a Christian organization highly regarded among paleoconservatives starts to advocate the death penalty for a class of offenders that this punishment has not been applied to for centuries, isn't it a valid question to ask to what extent this reinstituted penalty would be applied? More importantly, should the head of this organization who once held high political aspirations be asked to clarify his own position regarding his underling's provacative ruminations?

Human Debris Threatens To Tear Arizona Apart If Immigration Law Enforced

Police Enforce Nonexistent Laws Regarding Photography

Wouldn't this by definition be a form of tyranny, the enforcement of nonexistent laws?  Makes you wonder what other areas of life in which the government is getting by with similar outrages.

Obama Tells Americans Why We Should Praise His Holy Name

Yahoo article suggests one can save money by "sharing with neighbors". Frankly, I'd rather pay the extra and not be bothered by them poking around in my business.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Police Do Nothing As Rabid Sodomites Threaten To Defile Children

Muslims Claim Opposition To Mosques In America On The Rise: Neglect To Mention If Muslim Nations More Welcoming Of Churches

New electronic health records to include body mass index but not HIV status or number of abortions. But if it's the government's business what you do with your head hole, shouldn't it also track what you're doing with the bottom ones?

Know me long enough and I'll tick you off so much, you'll deny knowing my very existence.

Though the Gospel and sound doctrine doen't change, that does not preclude formulating solid theology and apologetics in a number of ways or in a variety of mediums.

Will Paycheck Fairness Act Screw Over Men In Favor Of Women?

Why shouldn't Americans of both sexes be educated on how to get the best salary possible? Even more importantly, shouldn't the millions and millions of dollars going into education already be enough to train them in this skill?

Contrary to the composers of worship music drivel, God is not the air you breathe. If you think that, you are a pantheist. Frankly, who wants to feel the same kind of emotional funk towards God that one does towards a member of the opposite sex that won't give you the time of day?

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Tweets About Whale Wars

Though Whale Wars is an interesting program, in light of it, Discovery Networks should broadcast from a favorable standpoint a program about a band of prolife activists disrupting the operations of an abortion clinic.

On Whale Wars season 2, episode 8, the Japanese whalers should be applauded in their restraint by only use an acoustic weapon on the Sea Shepherd copter. These beatnik environmentalists should just be grateful a surface to air missile wasn't used.

Perhaps the Japanese whalers should get their own rubber dingies and toss noxious substances onto the Sea Shepherd ship for a change. Given the disgusting things Asians are known to eat, are pungent aromatic assaults the best way to deter the whalers?

Will there be a season of Whale Wars where the Sea Shepherds plan to harass Eskimos for hunting cetaceans? Guess the Japanese are too close to honorary White people to be able to gum up the conceptual relativism of these leftwingers by asking who are they to impose their dietary values on another culture.

The Sea Shepherds ought to be glad they are not dealing with the Japanese of the World War II era. Say what you want about that empire's faults, it's doubtful they would put up with hippies harassing that nation's ships.

Seems Paul Watson is the only crew member to grow obese on a vegetarian diet. Most of them look pathetically sickly and thin. Even the crews pet African looked plumper than the average Westerner onboard

With the sinking of the Ady Gil, maybe the organization now knows how it feels to have one of their vessels rammed.

It was stated that $5 million was paid for the Sea Shepherd's vessel the Bob Barker. Was that bid closest to the actual retail price without going over?

by Frederick Meekins

Frau Obama Again Stuffs Her Pie Hole With Icecream Before Condemning The Sloth Of Americans

Oil Spill Threatens China

Utah Town Offers Spanish Prayer On July 4th

Blacks Riot To Avoid Going To School With Other Blacks

Yet we Whites are expected to have a smile plastered across our faces over such a scholastic prospect.

Wouldn't the NAACP demand that a White person that committed a racist act over 20 years ago still be fired from their government job? The organization struck a blow at Ross Perot for doing nothing more than saying "You people".

Obamaphiles Hope To Spark Islamic Revival In America

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

"Family Guy" is up for an Emmy for a song mocking the retarded. Maybe Mel Gibson wouldn't be in so much hot water and applauded as a genius if he had sung the slurs hurled at his concubine rather than yelling them into the telephone.

If liberals are going to insist that standard English is not the national language, on what grounds do they then look down on Sarah Palin for a single mispronunciation? At least she communicates at a level well above the extend grunts & moans of press secretary Robert Gibbs.

Mexican Women Smuggling Potential Afghan Terrorists Off U.S. Army Base

Does Bob Schieffer Think Black Panthers Threatening To Kill White Babies Isn't A Big Deal?

Gingrich Suggests Tea Party Movement Brownnose NAACP

Glenn Beck Announces He Might Be Going Blind

No doubt the same liberals who insist that you undermine the Republic and promote racism if you consider Obama anything other than lord and savior will no doubt ridicule this they way they mocked Tony Snow's cancer.

Has The Mystery Of Cropcirlces Been Solved?

A ship infested with spiders was turned away from docking in Guam. Just think how an invasive species could be used by terrorists with a jar of bugs tucked away in their knapsacks waltzing over the border to destroy a nation’s economy and ecosystem.

Obama Spends Tax Dollars To Establish Abortion & Islamic Law In Kenya

And bet you the abortions aren't targetting the Muslims.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Frau Obama lectures us how we should replace soda with water. How about we replace her next election day?

Contrary to a Facebook status update I've seen, the authenticity of one's Christian walk is not determined by how satisfied you are with your station in life. A better measure would be if you show up to work everyday even if you'd rather be somewhere else.

If Glenn Beck correctly points out the similarities between Obama's policies and Communism and Nazism, then why is it wrong for a group of Tea Party activists to do so with a billboard? Guess Tea Party luminaries don't think you should be permitted to exercise your own free thought and speech until you are a Fox News millionaire as well.

NAACP Applauds Bureaucrat Addmitting Refusal To Assist White Farmer

Lawyers have harmed this nation far worse than the armed forces ever have. Therefore, isn’t it hypocritical to work for a law firm while holding to the impropriety of permitting military recruiters onto law school campuses?

If the NAACP distanced itself from the racist elements within its membership ranks, that entire pinko front group would go out of business.

Supreme Court Thought Police Kick Praying Students Into Gutter

Obamas Stuff Pie Holes With Ice Cream After Lecturing Americans That Desert Isn't A Right & To Drink Water Rather Than Soda

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Unless he wants them hanging around his neck like a political milstone, Michael Peroutka really needs to examine and consider the viewpoints of some of his closest staff members and advisors.

Just learned from a Christian Reconstructionist how we are never to go through an emotionally down period about anything. So, if their ilk ever siezed power, not only will we have to hold membership in their Calvinistic churches in order to enjoy the rights of citizenship, I guess they will send "happy police" around ...to ascertain if the smiles plastered across our faces are irritatingly broad enough.

Though Geraldo is to be commended for examining the Afrosupremacism of groups such as the NAACP & The New Black Panthers, is he going to expose the terroristic radicalism of illegal alien frontgroups such as MECHA & La Raza?

If Glenn Beck thinks we should go back to the primary historical sources to see that the Confederacy was "racist", why is he closed off to those that suggest Martin Luther King had socialistic Communistic tendencies and influences?

When a French "First Lady" handed down snooty decrees as to what the people ate, she was denounced as an "Austria Whore". Perhaps our own First Lady should cogitate upon that moment in History.

When a French "First Lady" handed down snooty decrees as to what the people ate, she was denounced as an "Austria Whore". Perhaps our own First Lady should cogitate upon that moment in History.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Michelle Obama needs to be reminded that maybe if the Black children behaved a bit more, they'd be less likely to end up in prison.

Boycott The Boycotters

Most Americans are no doubt aware of the tragedy of the oil slick coating the Gulf Coast from the damaged petroleum rig. What they might not be aware of is the attitude among elites of how we as citizens and consumers are simply to go along with whatever position they craft as a response regarding the matter.

A headline from the 5/25/10 online edition of the Washington Post bemoans "For Some Washington Drivers, Convenience Outweighs Calls For BP Gas Boycott”. The story laments the tendency of certain consumers who “...prioritize convenience over taking a moral or political stand.”

For starters, in this day where it is constantly pounded into our heads that no one is to impose their views on any one else or to even dare to suggest that certain values might be superior to others, on what grounds are we expected to do something because someone with no real binding authority over us tells us to?

Many of the rabblerousers behind the BP boycott are some of the same nags behind the boycott of the state of Arizona regarding the immigration law. Yet these crusaders would turn around and become moral libertines if some pro-family coalition organized a boycott of states such as Vermont authorizing sodomite matrimony.

In all fairness, busybody progressives are not the only ones to use boycotts not so much in pursuit of a policy objective but rather to exert power and control over their respective constituencies.

I remember in the early 90’s in some Christian circles how an edict was handed down how the truly spiritual wouldn’t shop at K-Mart because at the time its B. Dalton Booksellers subsidiary was selling a line of erotic novels. From the vehemence behind the pronouncement, one almost feared the possibility of expulsion from the more doctrinally rigorous Christian schools if it was discovered that was where one’s parents shopped every once in a while.

It is a good thing to have as much information as possible as to the implications of one’s socioeconomic decisions. However, when an interest group advances beyond the function of conveying information regarding a perfectly legal and acceptable product to demanding that a certain action be taken in response to the purveyors of the product for reasons tangential rather than inherent to the particular product in question and threaten with sanction or approbation those deciding not to go along with the particular campaign, the group presenting the overly enthusiastic warning may also require additional scrutiny as a threat to our liberty.

by Frederick Meekins

Maybe opposing a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center is “Islamosphobic”. But it wasn’t Islamophobes that knocked the towers down in the first place.

Maybe opposing a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center is “Islamosphobic”. But it wasn’t Islamophobes that knocked the towers down in the first place.

Given the vocal soteriology of its key spokesman, wonder how long until "Arminians" will no longer be welcome at Institute On The Constitution events, and should those of this organization's persuasion come to power, would they deny non-Calvinists the right or opportunity to vote.

British Conservatives As Nadless As Liberals

Tea Party Groups Exposes The Racism Of NAACP

NAACP Insinuates Mel Gibson's Potty Mouth Worse Than Knocking Out His Concubine's Teeth

Before denouncing the Tea Party movement as racist, shouldn't the NAACP expunge this epistemological tendency within itself. Is its "One Nation" counter rally going to renounce minority set asides and the denigration of White folks as epitomized by the Black Panther terrorists that Eric Holder let off scott free?

Frau Obama Endorses Rampaging Blacks

UK Announces Unmanned Fighter

Rand Paul Correct On Poverty

What Is Bohemian Grove?

"And The People Turned From The Folly Of The Protobeast Though Destruction Continued To Stalk Them"

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Government Unable To Repel Alien Swarms

Obama Justice Department Hostile Towards Whites

CNN Editor Mourns Death Of Terrorist Leader

Apparently It Is The Government's Business In San Francisco What Syruppy Liquids You Put In Your Mouth

The Bronx Turned Into A Mexican Ghetto

Though the word "decline" would make for a more dramatic headline, that part of the city was never much to begin with.

China Demands $1 Million Ransom For Pandas

Looks Like Holder Sniffs The Same Turd As Obama

Mexican Subversives Infiltrate American Public Schools

Leftwing Religious Kooks Travel To Gulf To Lecture Mere Commoners Why It Is A Sin For Us To Use Fuel

Gay Blood Endangers Public Health

Liberal Presbyterians Suggest Normalizing Sodomite Matrimony

On Fox & Friends, a slutty looking Democrat in an outfit covering less than a beachtowel ridiculed the Arizona governor for lacking a college degree. At least Jane Brewer knows enough to come on TV fully clothed.

Monday, July 05, 2010

Lessons In Apologetics #2: Rationalism & Fideism

The next epistemological methodology is rationalism.  Of rationalism, Geisler writes, "Rationalism is characterized by its stress on the innate a priori ability of human reason to know truth.  Basically, rationalists hold that what is knowable or demonstrable by human reason is true (29)."  To the rationalist, the mind takes precedence over experience and the information acquired through the senses as a foundation for truth and knowledge.

In a rationalist methodology, there exists  in  the  mind  a number of innate ideas or principles that allow the individual to arrive at an understanding of the universe.  These include principles of logic such as the law of noncontradiction.  It is from contemplation upon ideas generated through reflection upon such foundational principles that the thinker is able to postulate systems of truth in a manner reminiscent of mathematics and geometry.

For example, in his system, Descartes started from his "cogito, ergo, sum (I think, therefore I am)" as his ability to doubt was the one thing he could not doubt.  From here, Descartes built a theistic proof.

Descartes begins this with the admission that, since he lacks knowledge, he is imperfect.  However, to realize one is imperfect, one must have knowledge that perfection exists.  Yet perfection cannot arise from within the imperfect.  Therefore, there must be a perfect mind from which perfection originates and this is God (31).

An apologetic utilizing the rationalist approach possesses a number of strengths as well as drawbacks.  As to its strengths, the rationalist method stresses a consistency of reality.

It follows that a rational God would create a universe that regularly operates in accord with verifiable laws that we as His creations would be able to arrive at through deliberative contemplation.  As rationalists posit, the mind to an extent must possess some kind of mental architecture to process the jumble of sense experiences the individual is bombarded with almost constantly.   Even  Scripture  indicates   that  part  of   man's knowledge regarding God and His character is innate as Romans says that even the Gentiles, who were not formally given the Law in the same direct manner as their Hebrew counterparts, still had many aspects of the Law written upon their hearts.

Despite the strengths of the rationalist approach to apologetics, the methodology is not without drawbacks.  The foremost is the acknowledgement that it can be argued that the rationally consistent does not always translate into the realm of necessarily actual and does not provide the bedrock certainty its advocates claim. For example, regarding the ontological argument, Geisler notes, "But it is not logically necessary for a necessary Being to exist anymore than it is for a triangle to exist...But the point here is that there is no purely logical way to eliminate the 'if' (43)."

Of the next religious epistemology, fideism, Geisler writes, "In view of the fact that empiricism led to skepticism...and that rationalism cannot rationally demonstrate its first principles, fideism becomes a more reliable option in religious epistemology.  Perhaps there is no rational or evidential way to establish Christianity (47)."  Thus fideism holds that truth in religious matters rests on an accepting faith rather than a critical scrutiny.

As with the other methodologies, fideism comes in a variety shades. On its more moderate side, one finds Blaise Pascal.  At the more extreme end of the spectrum, one would find the likes of Karl Barth.

As a fideist, one might find Pascal a bit subdued.  Though one would assume reason had no place in fideism, Pascal did not dismiss rational appeals outright.  He just did not build his foundation or case upon them.  Of Pascal's position, Geisler writes, "A proof at best may be the instrument by which God places faith in one's heart (49)."

Thus, the real difference between Pascal and the rationalist was basically a differing estimation in what each thought reason could achieve.  To the rationalist, the thinker is able to deduce their way to a logically irrefutable foundation for a belief in God.  To Pascal, such proofs were not absolutely conclusive and the chasm separating doubt and certainty had to be crossed by a bridge of faith.

Since at best, in the mind of Pascal, the individual is left with a fifty/fifty chance regarding the existence of God, the matter did not come down to a dispassionate calculation but rather to a matter of personal existential destiny best summarized by his famous wager (49).  According to this wager, if the odds as to whether or not God exists are about even, one is better off believing God exists and then be proven wrong since upon death you would merely pass out of existence than to say God does not exist and then be proven wrong upon death as then one would end up in Hell.

At the other end of fideism's spectrum stands the Neo-Orthodox such as Karl Barth.  According to Barth, God is "wholly other" in that God can only be known through faith in revelation.  Geisler summarizes Barth's position as such: "We do not know the Bible  is  God's  Word  by  any  objective  evidence.   It  is  a self-attesting truth (54)."  Thus to the Barthian, the accounts contained in the Bible transpired on a plane beyond the parameters of objective, investigative history.  One either accepts them by faith or one does not.  Therefore, the believer does not have to answer and is immune from those such as the Higher Critics claiming to apply the rigors of scholarship to the scriptural texts in the hopes of either authenticating or discrediting these documents.

As with rationalism, fideism has both strengths and drawbacks.  Fideists are to be commended for holding that the God of the Bible is much more than the God of mathematics.  Though there is merit in the attempt to prove that belief in God does not violate reason and logic, there is a great danger in reducing God to the level of a distant first cause not all that interested in how human beings live their daily lives.  Fidesits are also correct that ultimately, no matter how much evidence one might collect or how many syllogisms one might be able to deduce, one has to make a leap of faith over those gaps of doubt that remain no matter how small they might be.

Yet despite the strength of their methodology, it has shortcomings as well.  Foremostly, fideism makes it very difficult to engage in a debate or discussion with someone holding to another worldview if one must accept a comprehensive system of faith solely by faith without evaluating between them with some agreed upon criteria.  Geisler writes, "...either a fideist offers a justification for his belief or else he does not.  If he does not,  then  as  unjustified  belief  it  has  no rightful claim to knowledge (63)."

Source:

Geisler, Norman. "Christian Apologetics". Baker Academic, 1988.

by Frederick Meekins

Friday, July 02, 2010

The American Bar Association has denounced the Arizona Immigration Law as "racist". Isn't it logically inconsistent for this group of lawyers to come out in opposition to a statute saying who is allowed to be in America and what documentation validates that status while that guild promulgates regulations saying who can practice law and the paperwork governing such?

The American Bar Association has denounced the Arizona Immigration Law as "racist". Isn't it logically inconsistent for this group of lawyers to come out in opposition to a statute saying who is allowed to be in America and what documentation validates that status while that guild promulgates regulations saying who can practice law and the paperwork governing such?

An Asian literally hacked in my informant's face today. No wonder most strains of deadly pestilence begin as epidemics in that part of the world.

Wonder Woman's Patriotism Diminishes Along With Her Exposed Cleavage

Are Welfare Payments Being Swiped Against Strippers G-Strings?

McLaren is a nut. In his interview on Issues Etc, he characterized purchasing food in a grocerry store as being complicit in cultural accomodation. Though his Burtonsville compound is in what was once the more rural suburbs of the DC area, it doesn't exactly look to be self sustainining nor McLaren a burly agricultural type.

Obama insists borders and fences do not ensure national security. Then why is there an exceedingly tall one around the White House along with snipers and concrete barricades surrounding assorted government buildings in Washington?

Thursday, July 01, 2010

Into The Heart Of Darkness, Part 2

In "Into The Heart Of Darkness, Part 1", I examined the Black liberation theology of Jeremiah Wright and how the leftist radicalism at the heart of this worldview serves as the foundation of the belief system of President Barack Obama and forms the basis of many of his policies. And even though Obama claims to have renounced his connections to his former pastor Jeremiah Wright, since Obama sat under this pastor for nearly 20 years and continues to advocate these kinds of policies, it is obvious Obama has not distanced himself from sociopolitical radicalism to the extent he claims he has.

Even if Obama is successful in tossing under the rug the insinuations of having embraced Afrosupremacist theology, he has gone out of his way repeatedly to let the world know he spent the early years of his career as a community organizer. Obama supporters would have average Americans believe that this position involved little more than getting the plumbing fixed in rundown apartments or organizing senior citizens outings to the local supermarket for the elderly without their own transportation.

While these are laudable undertakings, these tasks do not encapsulate the true purposes and intents of community organizing. These are just the bait to lure the needy yet unsuspecting into deeper levels of manipulation.

Though Barack Obama looked to Jeremiah Wright to provide a theological foundation for his ambitions and life's work, the danger the President represents goes beyond even the vile message propagated by his religious mentor. For despite his egregious faults, one has to hand it to Jeremiah Wright that at least he is upfront about what he believes and speaks his mind.

Obama's apostles have tried to place their liege's hallowed past beyond the realm of critical scrutiny by insinuating it is now racist to look into what exactly community organizing is and that Jesus Himself was one. However, it is anything but holy and norhing whatsoever to do with race.

At its heart, community organizing is about Communist agitation. In a National Review article titled "What Did Obama Do As A Community Organizer", Byron York defines community organizing as "the practice of identifying a specific aggrieved population...and agitating them until they become so upset about their condition that they take collective action to put pressure on local, state, or federal officials to fix the problem often by giving the affected group money."

It sounds like such an approach is morally neutral as it doesn't differ on the surface all that much from the tactics employed by any group along the political spectrum. However, in the case of Barack Obama, this strategy would be used to implement the kinds of things he learned from Jeremiah Wright and the other acolytes of perdictious revolution.

The school of activism with which Obama aligned himself employed such tactics in pursuits of obviously radical leftist ends. Obama's employer the Calumet Community Religious Conference embraced the doctrines of Saul Alinsky.

Alinsky's magnum opus Rules For Radicals is dedicated to none other than Lucifer, the Prince of Darkness. Thus, if Obama was mentored by those who in turn took their inspiration from the devil, by definition, doesn't that make Obama none other than Satan's intellectual grandchild?

The original purpose of the Church was to use its resources to assist the individual to get their lives straightened out in the name and power of the Lord Jesus Christ. However, under the rubric of social organizing, we are to no longer view ourselves as responsible for ourselves but instead as part of a COMMUNITY and with docility take commands and instructions from those that have set themselves up as the vanguard of the proletariat who are not bound by the restrictions placed upon we lower breeds of humanity.

This is seen in terms of the denigration of American icon John Wayne. In most of his films, John Wayne portrayed characters that looked to their own moral wherewithal or their families to solve their own problems. Such thinking that is nowadays mocked used to be admired as self-reliance. In the worldview of Barack Obama, we are to have both our guns and our God wrest from us and are instead to look to the state for purpose and to solve our problems as epitomized by his remark that he wanted to “make government cool again”.

Though he may not say it directly, but by examining what Obama says and in analyzing it in light of its implications and how he himself lives, one can legitimately conclude that this would-be messiah thinks that you exist for the benefit of the state and those like himself better than you. For example, at the cornerstone of Obama’s social philosophy is the plan to reduce the standard and quality of life for the vast majority of Americans. In May 2008 in a speech in Oregon, Obama said, “We can’t drive our SUV’s and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times.”

Does the average American really comprehend the level of control being proposed here? Why in the name of perdition does anyone want a president that thinks it is his place to tell you what to drive, what you can eat, and how warm you can keep your house? For any government that can tell you what you can and cannot do in your own home to that extent will eventually no longer permit you to live in your own home for reasons of national security, environmental sustainability, or whatever other bogus excuse will be bandied about the day the mass roundups start.

Even worse, Obama does not live by the standard he thinks out to be imposed upon you. For while you are not to eat anything not on a government approved menu or go anywhere beyond the radius one can travel by unicycle or pogostick, Obama does not sit home in the dark, shivering with a blanket draped over his shoulders, munching on saltines.

The environment is no where near the point of collapse that he wants you to be duped into believing. One of the places Obama vacations is the U.S. Virgin Islands. Though some esteem Obama with an almost messianic aura and he has come close to applying such rhetoric to himself in prattle about turning back the seas and such, I some how doubt he walked to that particular destination.

Yet it is not enough for Obama that your life comes to a screeching halt to assuage the environmental consciences of big shot liberals such as himself and Al Gore (who has obviously been eating whatever he wants since leaving the Vice Presidency). Obama also wants your life regimented and under close government scrutiny.

According to the sacred Barack, it is not enough for the average citizen to mind their own business and take care of one’s own family. Rather, one must surrender oneself to the will of the group or the COMMUNITY.

As the next stage of the liberation theology he sat under for nearly 20 years in the church overseen by Jeremiah Wright, Obama postulated in a commencement address at Wesleyan University in June 2008 that “our individual salvation depends on collective salvation.” This is quite revealing as to the underlying religious orientation of this particular president.

In traditional Biblical theology, salvation is a state of grace or unmerited favor imputed to the INDIVIDUAL pardoning one from the penalty for sin because it the individual that must believe in Jesus as the only begotten Son of God who lived the perfect life we could not, died, and shed His blood as the penalty for our sins and rose from the dead that we have eternal life. However, to Barack Obama, salvation is not about an eternal reward for loving Jesus with one’s mind, body, and soul; rather salvation to Barack Obama is about conformity to the group. You, as a distinct consciousness, do not matter all that much.

This is evident in both Obama's policy proposals as well as in his disdain for the behavioral principles underlying the moral code based in Scripture that prevents some of man's tendencies from degenerating into tyrannical anarchy or collectivism if these desires become unshackled from the realist perspective that man is a sinner and still hears sin’s siren call even when forgiven and redeemed through the shed blood of Christ.

To prevent the masses of the Biblically illiterate from being swept away by Obama’s rhetorical manipulations, Dr. James Dobson spoke out against some of the secular messiah’s misinterpretations of the Good Book. Falling for some of the hype that he’s the best thing since Jesus Christ and actually the Lord’s replacement in the hearts of many, Obama has proceeded to inform the rest of us which parts of his “predecessor’s” Word may apply in the new “AB” era, as some have suggested all of history now be divided between before and after Obama.

Without a more careful exegesis into and research of the Biblical text, the holy Obama concluded that, if one thinks that prohibitions against homosexuality still apply today, than those against the consumption of shellfish still apply as well. In response, according to a 6/24/08 Associated Press article titled “Obama: Dobson Is Making Stuff Up With Bible Criticism”, Dobson dared to say of Obama’s assertion, “I think he’s [Obama] deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology.”

Dobson’s opinion is actually closer to the historic Christian position. Most denominations and theologians claim that the majority of Israelite dietary guidelines do not apply to the Church composed of both Jews and Gentiles because these restrictions were not reiterated in the New Testament and in fact were set aside in various passages.

For example, in Matthew 15:11, Jesus Himself assures that that one is not defiled by what goes into one’s mouth but rather by what comes out of it. And in Acts 10, the Apostle Peter is told in a vision to deliberately eat of an animal said to be ceremonially unclean. If the act of eating a particular kind of animal was in and of itself immoral and sinful, would the God of the universe have given instructions to have done so?

The same cannot be said of homosexuality. Nowhere are the Old Testament injunctions labeling the practice as wrong rescinded in the New and in fact they are reemphasized in passages such as Romans 1 and included in a list of offences barring their perpetrators from entering Heaven if one does not seek forgiveness for them through the shed blood of Christ.

And contrary to all the sissies in a hissy over Rick Warren offering the inauguration prayer because Warren did not endorse the notion of gay marriage, insisting that this lifestyle is wrong does not mean that those falling into this temptation will be rounded up and sent to prison (though a percentage would probably enjoy that) or be put to death. It could be argued that Jesus softened the penalty for the transgressions of the lustful flesh.

Though Jesus was merciful He nevertheless retained the position that what the women at the well did was sin by telling her to sin no more. Today, those wanting to air their dirty laundry with pride rather than keeping it between only God and themselves as those with a tender conscience would prefer, vociferously insist that what they have done isn’t even sin.

And in the eyes of mystical humanists such as Obama and his ministerial supporters in the Order of the Scarlet Woman, this is the area in which Dobson has done something unforgivable. Dobson has held on to the notion that sin, in its most basic form, is an individual act.

According to Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, who basically endorsed Obama for no other reason than that Obama is Black as before Caldwell supported George W. Bush, said Dobson was “a bit over the top”, and “crossed the line”. More importantly, Caldwell admonished, “There has been a call for a higher level of politics and politicking. So to attack at this level is inappropriate and I think unacceptable and we at least want to hold everybody accountable.”

Ladies and gentlemen, what is being called for here is an abridgement of the fundamental constitutional liberties of anyone daring to disagree with or even question the new messiah. For while Dr. Dobson has been told to essentially sit down and shut up, a cabal of leftwing clerics of which Cadwell has been numbered established a website called JamesDobsonDoesntSpeakForMe.com. Examining the groups fundamental principles is quite instructive regarding the new social gospel that elevates the group above the individual.

For example, the website proclaimed regarding Dobson, “He doesn’t speak for me when he uses religion as a wedge to divide.” Let’s look at this for a moment.

Aren’t Obama, his false prophet Jeremiah Wight, and lesser luminaries such as Rev. Caldwell each riding the coattails of each using religion to divide? For crying out loud, the Black liberation theology expounded by Jeremiah Wright thinks God doesn’t even love you if you are White.

Furthermore, who says religion is not meant to divide? While Scripture tells us that God is not willing that any should perish, there are just as many other passages informing us that Christ came to separate the sheep from the goats, the wheat from the chaff.

Also, interesting, isn’t it, how in the coming together in unity that it is those holding to a traditional understanding of Biblical morality that are to compromise their standards rather than those who fall short of these principles and from then on strive to elevate their conduct?

As the declaration points out, “What does speak for me is David’s Psalm celebrating how good and pleasant it is when we come together in unity.” That is true, but in order to unite, there must be considerable agreement as to what principles one is going to unite around. Of those with whom one disagrees considerably, the Bible commands, “Come from out among them and be ye separate.”

The declaration continues, “James Dobson doesn’t speak for me when he uses the beliefs of others as a line of attack; He doesn’t speak for me when he denigrates his neighbors’ views when they don’t line up with his.”

As noted earlier, by criticizing Dobson’s criticizing, aren’t they themselves guilty of criticizing? Did not the holy Barack partake of the same act?

What if Dobson's neighbor was a vile skinhead that plucked the eyes out of newborn kittens? Is Dobson just suppose to sit their and not say anything about this ethical transgression as well if we are to take the mutated uncontextualized version of judge not to its ultimate conclusion?

Contrary to the Obamaist declaration, Dobson does not confine the values of faith to two or three issues. First off, Focus on the Family is not a church.

Thus, the organization does not necessarily have the same spiritual mandate to address to the same extent the totality of existence of life that God's sacred assembly has been called to. Yet that said, Focus on the Family addresses a wider array of issues and concerns than these liberal Black churches that have for the most part confined their message to propagating the blame Whitey mentality of whom Republicans and Conservatives rank their primary targets.

From the tone of the declaration, Dobson stands accused of not seeking justice, encouraging the oppressed, or defending the cause of the vulnerable. Yet when Dobson rises to do so, these collared hypocrites accuse him of reducing the faith to two or three issues and not working to restore what is broken in our communities. If the efforts of Focus on the Family have been reduced to two or three issues, it is only because that apostates like Obama and his supporters have focused their war against Christ and the Bible towards a few central cultural pillars in the hopes of causing the entire edifice of our heritage of liberty to implode in upon itself.

Unable to speak or act on their own behalf, who is more than the unborn that the babykillers can’t wait to hack apart with their meat cleavers? What institution is more vulnerable than the contemporary family with the assorted threats out to achieve its abolition through easy divorce, its dilution through its alleged recognized extension to homosexuals, and through the proliferation of government programs that make parents of both sexes feel either redundant in the case of men as providers or obsolete in the case of work at home mothers.

Leftist clergy drone on and on about the beauty of religious unity and cooperation. However, if they are going to embrace practices such as infanticide and sodomite nuptials as good and positive things, one might as well toss the Bible in the paper shredder and sleep in Sunday morning. Under such a worldview, nothing is wrong anymore and you might as well do whatever the Sheol you please.

Under the Obama regime, while your obligation to God might be diminished, don’t think you are going to slide by on easy street in terms of guilt being toned down. Rather a whole new litany of demands will be placed upon an otherwise productive citizen.

In commencement addresses given in both 2008 and 2009, Obama repeatedly called for a renewed spirit of national service. To most Americans accustomed to working for what they have, on the surface this may sound like little more than what they are already doing. However, the plans go much shockingly further.

In the free market economy of the United States, the individual offers some kind of commodity --- be it labor, a tangible good produced, brainpower, or time --- in exchange for monetary compensation. And though the system is not perfect, the higher the participant rises in the system, the greater the rewarding compensation one is able to accrue.

However, that may come to a screeching halt if our Seigneur and Chief gets to have his way. For in his worldview, no longer will it be enough to strive within the rules to get the things one wants. Rather in a manner not unlike a medieval manor, if the New World Order advocated by a succession of presidents each in their own way with distinctive emphases comes to pass, you will be bound to the same occupational station and residential area not until you as a free person decides to change it but rather until those higher up the system decide to amend such biographical characteristics.

In his 2008 commencement address, Obama said, “There’s no community service requirement in the real world; no one is forcing you to care. You can take your diploma, walk off stage, and chase only after the big house and the nice suits and all the other things our money, culture says, you should buy. You can choose to narrow your concerns and live your life in a way that tries to keep your story separate from America’s.”

Obama cites as precedent his own case where he took a position as a community organizer making $12,000 per year while driving a $2,000 car. But whereas you are suppose to remain content at a life of minimal toil, since Obama has always been in his own mind the man who would be king, he was always entitled to possess so much more.

According to an Investor’s Business Daily article posted at Yahoo News on 6/2/2008 titled “Living On Obama’s Collective Farm", Obama made over $4 million that year. But I guess that’s what it takes to keep a ball-and-chain like Michelle in $500 athletic shoes far uglier than my $20 K-Mart ones and $5000 handbags (a good used automobile doesn’t cost much more than that).

From comparing these dichotomies, one can conclude that Obama does not really care so much about the poor. Rather, in true Alinskyite fashion, he sees those in such circumstances as pawns to agitate into a froth through which to seize power and advance his own status. If it had meant a life of toil and anonymity as it does for most dedicating their lives to uplifting the poverty-stricken, would Obama have even pursued this path in his early career?

As to whether or not Obama will allow participation in national service to remain an individual choice is open to interpretation. In the 2008 address, Obama went on to say, “On the big issues that our nation faces, difficult choices await. We’ll have to face some hard truths, and some sacrifice will be required --- not only from you individually, but from the nation as a whole.” But in light of $5000 handbags, weekend jaunts onboard Air Force I to Broadway plays, and pizza chefs flown in from the Midwest to appease a gastronomical hankering, that call does not apply to his highness of course.

Often, those without an inclination towards politics shrug their shoulders at these grandiose pronouncements and go about their business thinking that those in authority won't go much beyond the stage of public elocution. However, this time around such disengaged citizens might not be so insightful.

The President's ball-and-chain Michelle said in a campaign speech, "Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone...Barack Obama will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed."

Listen up, you battle ax, I'll be as cynical as I want to be. Your hubby might have been a Professor of Constitutional Law, but apparently he was as dedicated to that occupational station as he was to his seat in the Illinois State House, where he regularly and decisively voted “present, and to the U.S. Senate, where his attendance was shoddy at best as he merely used that office to campaign for the presidency and to pull down a hefty paycheck while doing it.

The First Amendment protects the rights of the individual to believe whatever they want and to enunciate their opinion as to the actions and motivations of the nation’s leaders. This includes saying that these politicians are little more than frauds. Any legislation or executive order to the contrary is an infringement of this Constitutional protection.

And as to being isolated and in one’s “comfort zone”, so long as one pays their bills and stays to themselves, they have the right to be every bit of a hermit as they want to be. Until any President can lock down the border and prevent illegal aliens from violating the territorial integrity of the United States, the Chief Executive has so failed in his fundamental responsibility that he ant those that work beneath him should have no spare time whatsoever to be concerned with how I spend my own time.

Though the discerning might have to weave the disparate fragments together into a complete tapestry, the minions of despotism and iniquity are so full of themselves that they cannot resist scattering crumbs and often wholesale cognitive meals detailing their intentions to destroy liberty and reduce the population to the level of modern day serfs. Shame is, the election of Barack Obama is proof how a significant percentage of the American people would rather ignore the harsh realties staring them right in the face.

by Frederick Meekins

If an organization is going to promote the notion that Lincoln was a tyrant for holding the Union together because it is believed that each state is a distinct legal and political entity, on what grounds does a spokesman for that organization then deem it proper to advocate that a hardline Puritanism be imposed on all the states when not all states trace their founding directly to that particular interpretation of Christianity?

Bureaucracy Prevents World Largest Oil Skimmer From Getting To Work

Seems more and more that the Coast Guard is the most sissifed of the armed services.

Famed Atheist Stricken With Cancer

Does Krogers Harbor Islamofascist Sympathies?

Rep. Pete Stark needs to be reminded that illegal aliens have murdered numerous Americans whereas neither the Tea Party movement nor the Minute Men have physically harmed a single person.

Obama's Troll A Book Banner

Is Ergun Caner A Fraud?

One sermon of his I remember listening to seemed devoid of any serious content whatsoever.

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

I saw a piece of chewed gum stuck to the stairwell wall. You’d think by the university level of education the proper disposal of gum wouldn’t need to be an explicit component of the core curriculum.

Though they profess to stand for the U.S. Constitution, Christian Reconstructionists could actually undermine the United States if not watched with discernment. For if they ever ascended to power, they would likely undermine the basic liberties of those not agreeing with their particular brand of Calvinism.

If they ever ascended to power, wonder how long until the Christian Reconstructionists implemented their dictatorship and began their persecution of those of us they’d classify as “Arminian devils”. As postmillenialists, most Reconstructionists believe that the Church (not Christ) will implement the Millennial Kingdom. Any human movement promising to establish Heaven on Earth or a near perfect society always ends inflicting mass bloodshed.

If it is wrong to “twist Jesus into a middle class image” according to David Platt on the 6/10/10 Boundless podcast, wouldn’t it be just as wrong to warp the Messiah into a “proletarian social justice Jesus” as well? Dr. Dobson needs to get a grip on the young Emergent Church Marxist-types infiltrating Focus On The Family.

Are Sea Turtles Being Set On Fire?

Now Fully Clothed, Will As Many Fantacize About Being Tied Up By Wonder Woman?


Niether does she seem as alluringly shapely as in the past.

For attempting to sell a pair of leather electrical gloves, an associate was mocked and berated as a carnivore for his robust physique by a Hindu. I notice this filthy heathen migrated to the land of carnivores rather than remain in his enlightened hell-hole of a country.

If a teacher is opposed to the Pledge of Allegiance, they shouldn't be teaching in a public (i.e. government) school.

John Boehner wants Social Security age raised & means tested. If we regular Americans are to have our retirements snatched from us, lets abolish benefits for elected leaders at the same time. It is argued that most Americans are working longer anyway; however, unlike most of us, these Congressmen aren't stuck in positions that drain the life out of them & make them feel like Alzheimers is setting in prematurely.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Tips For Times Of Upheaval: if while in your car you find your self beset by a homicidal mob such as the world trade protesters, floor the accelerator. While you will likely die, at least you will have taken out a few of those intending to kill you and destroy your property anyway.

If Bin Ladin really wants to toss a wrench into things, the moment he gets caught, he ought to shout into the news camera there to record his surrender that he's accepted Jesus. Then wouldn't the all sins are equal crowd among Christians have to argue that he be pardoned and how it is an act of self-righteousness to insist that he pay for his crimes?

Evangelical Christians can't have it both ways. If they are going to hold to the idea that all sins are equal, let's cut out the drawn out testimonies that drone on and on reliving past debaucheries.

If all sins are equal, I should soon be getting a $10,000 speaking fee for memorizing the answer key to those asinine Accelerated Christian Education workbooks. Frankly, a kid should be beat if they can’t memorize the answers

Dobsonians Need To Focus Less On Existential Nonessentials

Contrary to the Dobsonian propaganda on the 3/26/10 Boundless podcast, providing that they behave themselves and that they work, there is nothing in the Bible about what age a young person is to leave home.

Interesting how the hosts enunciated a double standard that it's OK for young women to remain at home but not acceptable for young men.

Any woman that holds to such a position is basically a gold-digger.

These standards were justified as holdovers of Jewish culture.

However, unless I'm allowed to carry an Uzi down the street, our society is not a Jewish culture to that extent.

What about Isaac remaining at home until his 40's or do we only invoke those aspects of the Old Testament that fit the preconceived notions the psychologist paying the weekly check?

By Frederick Meekins

Senator Lieberman has articulated an admiration for China's internet security system. As a Jew, maybe he'd like to get acquainted with that dictatorship's system of prison labor camps.

At a Chicago Theological Seminary seminar, Jeremiah Wright has denounced Martin Luther King's nonviolence. By default for those without the conceptual capacity to read between the lines, that means Wright advocates violence against White people.

Minority Students Bribed To Read Over Summer

Bet if the majority of the students in the county in question were White, they wouldn't get a single penny.

Sales For Concert Tour Named For Adam's Psudoepigraphical Demonic First Wife Heading To Hades

If all sins are supposedly equal with none worse than any other, don't turn around and heep additional accolades and attention on those that have committed the "biggies" in the past. Force them to remain nothing more than pewsitting collection plate fillers like everyone else that didn't necessarily lead the lives of carnal debauchery that most of the extended testimonies seem to be filled with.

Interesting how Focus On The Family minions are silent about Bristol Palin milking notoriety as an unwed parent. Where is Dobson operative J. Budziszewski with whom I clashed years back over his appalling insistence that mothers not wedding the sirers of their illegitimate offspring be compelled to put their children up for adoption?

Jesus told the adulterous woman He saved from being stoned to go and sin no more. He did not offer her a lucrative speaking deal and TV cameos essentially glorifying her past deeds.

UK Police Vow To Prohibit Human Anger

Is There A War Pending Between Humans & Artificial Intelligence?

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Leftist Suburbs Surrender To Urban Livestock Movement

If so many towns weren't being overrun by foreigners refusing to comport themselves according to American standards of sanitation and hygiene, no urbanites would be allowed to propagate these creatures.

Will Government Use Oil Spill As Excuse To Seize Beach Front Property?

Is Pelosi crying over the violence at the G20 Summit or is that pathetic display only reserved for Tea Partiers that behave themselves?

Friday, June 25, 2010

If Glenn Beck seems bent on highlighting the forgotten Black heroes of history in the name of accuracy, is he also going to expose the Black villains that preyed upon innocent Whites?

Wildlife Refuge Issues Evasive Statement Saying Portions Of It Still Closed: Rush Falls For It As Being Open

White House Hires Consultant In Shariah Finance

Handout Mentality Grips Soccer Players Writhing In Feigned Agony

If the federal government is going to boycot Arizona, isn't this defacto reverse sesession?

Mel Gibson Files Restraining Order Against His Russian Concubine

Jews Have Gas

Half Of Detained Illegals Likely Jihadists

Contrary to Bannon Howse of Worldview Weekend, though one may question Alex Jones appearance on Russian television, there is nothing in Scripture bringing the sincereity of one's Christian faith in question if one aggrees with a number of positions advocated by Alex Jones.

Illegals Importing Whooping Cough Into The United States

Airline Forces Girls To Ditch Turtle

The claim is that reptiles can't be allowed onboard because they potentially spread salmonella. The creature is no filthier than the foreigners and sodomites on the flight or the street vermin and illegals we all come in contact with day to day.

Beck Denounced For Exposing America's Socialist Elites

Rescued Dolphin Dies

Cloth Bags Harbor Pestilence

Obama Appoints "Sanctuary City" Advocate To Undermine Immigration Law

Apparently California Needs Arizona More Than Arizona Needs California

Are Whales Being Poisoned To Death?

Parks To Eliminate Outhouses

And then the enviromentalists will wonder why folks will be downloading in the bushes. One imbecile couldn't even aim his strafing run with a provided target, his bombing deliberately going off course onto the restroom floor.

Welfare Spent In California Casinos

Theoretically, one should track back who was given what card and cut their benefits since it is obvious they do not need the assistance for necesities such as food, shelter and utility bills.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010